On 07/03/2013 04:14 AM, Paul Zimmerman wrote:
> Well, I'm really confused. Not for the first time :)
>
> This patch series removes the dual license from all of the dwc3
> source files, and replaces it with the GPL only. So how can you
> say "the driver as a whole is dual BSD/GPL"? What am I missin
> From: Felipe Balbi [mailto:ba...@ti.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2013 3:33 PM
>
> On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 07:03:10PM +, Paul Zimmerman wrote:
> > > From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
> > > Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2013 12:49 AM
> > >
> > > On 07/01/2013 09:18 AM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > > > Th
On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 07:03:10PM +, Paul Zimmerman wrote:
> > From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2013 12:49 AM
> >
> > On 07/01/2013 09:18 AM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > > This is a Linux-only driver which makes use
> > > of GPL-only symbols. It makes no sense to
> > >
> From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
> Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2013 12:49 AM
>
> On 07/01/2013 09:18 AM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > This is a Linux-only driver which makes use
> > of GPL-only symbols. It makes no sense to
> > maintain Dual BSD/GPL licensing for this driver.
> >
> > Considering that the
On 07/01/2013 09:18 AM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> This is a Linux-only driver which makes use
> of GPL-only symbols. It makes no sense to
> maintain Dual BSD/GPL licensing for this driver.
>
> Considering that the amount of work to use this
> driver in any different operating system would likely
> be
This is a Linux-only driver which makes use
of GPL-only symbols. It makes no sense to
maintain Dual BSD/GPL licensing for this driver.
Considering that the amount of work to use this
driver in any different operating system would likely
be as large as developing the driver from scratch and
conside
