Hi,
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 09:26:32AM +0800, Peter Chen wrote:
> On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 06:18:52PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 10:55:57AM +0800, Peter Chen wrote:
> > > If the glue layer is removed first (core layer later),
> > > it deletes the phy device first, then t
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 06:18:52PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 10:55:57AM +0800, Peter Chen wrote:
> > If the glue layer is removed first (core layer later),
> > it deletes the phy device first, then the core device.
> > But at core's removal, it still uses PHY's resources,
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 10:55:57AM +0800, Peter Chen wrote:
> If the glue layer is removed first (core layer later),
> it deletes the phy device first, then the core device.
> But at core's removal, it still uses PHY's resources, it may
> cause kernel's oops. It is much like the problem
> Paul Zimm
If the glue layer is removed first (core layer later),
it deletes the phy device first, then the core device.
But at core's removal, it still uses PHY's resources, it may
cause kernel's oops. It is much like the problem
Paul Zimmerman reported at:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-usb&m=136547502011472&w=2
