On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 02:53:01PM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 07:24:15PM +0200, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > This is an updated series of fixes rebased on the interface-data memory leak
> > discovered by Lennart.
> >
> > One of the reasons that I missed it was that the int
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 07:24:15PM +0200, Johan Hovold wrote:
> This is an updated series of fixes rebased on the interface-data memory leak
> discovered by Lennart.
>
> One of the reasons that I missed it was that the interface data was allocated
> in probe rather than attach, which in itself is
On Wed, 2012-10-24 at 19:24 +0200, Johan Hovold wrote:
> This is an updated series of fixes rebased on the interface-data memory leak
> discovered by Lennart.
>
> One of the reasons that I missed it was that the interface data was allocated
> in probe rather than attach, which in itself is a bug a
This is an updated series of fixes rebased on the interface-data memory leak
discovered by Lennart.
One of the reasons that I missed it was that the interface data was allocated
in probe rather than attach, which in itself is a bug as the memory would not
get released if usb-serial probe failes be
