On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 1:00 PM, Sekhar Nori wrote:
> On Thursday 03 November 2016 01:54 PM, Axel Haslam wrote:
>> Hi Sekhar, David,
>>
>> It might make sense to have this patch series,
>> squashed into a single patch, would you agree,
>> or do you prefer it as is: one-per-subsystem?
>
> Patches in
On Thursday 03 November 2016 01:54 PM, Axel Haslam wrote:
> Hi Sekhar, David,
>
> It might make sense to have this patch series,
> squashed into a single patch, would you agree,
> or do you prefer it as is: one-per-subsystem?
Patches in the current form are okay. Some coordination is required in
Hi Sekhar, David,
It might make sense to have this patch series,
squashed into a single patch, would you agree,
or do you prefer it as is: one-per-subsystem?
Regards
Axel.
On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 1:44 PM, Axel Haslam wrote:
> The usb ohci clock match is not working because the usb clock
> is reg
The usb ohci clock match is not working because the usb clock
is registered as "ohci" instead of "ohci.0"
But since there is only a single ohci instance, lets pass -1 to
the platform data id parameter and avoid the extra ".0" matching.
while we are fixing this, rename the driver to "ohci-da8xx" t
