HI,
On 23-12-16 02:25, Lu Baolu wrote:
Hi,
On 12/22/2016 09:18 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
Hi,
Hans de Goede writes:
Matthias, assuming Felipe is ok with putting this in drivers/misc
(minus the phy bindings), are you ok with the xhci blurb which
registers the platform-device for the "misc"
HI,
On 22-12-16 17:28, Mathias Nyman wrote:
On 22.12.2016 14:45, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 22-12-16 13:11, Felipe Balbi wrote:
Hi,
Hans de Goede writes:
Hi All,
Here are 2 patches which can and should be merged separately, but
which do belong together, as together they add support for
Hi,
On 12/23/2016 06:10 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 22-12-16 17:28, Mathias Nyman wrote:
>> On 22.12.2016 14:45, Hans de Goede wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On 22-12-16 13:11, Felipe Balbi wrote:
Hi,
Hans de Goede writes:
> Hi All,
>
> Here are 2 patches which c
Hi,
On 12/22/2016 09:18 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Hans de Goede writes:
Here are 2 patches which can and should be merged separately, but
which do belong together, as together they add support for the
usb-phy / mux bits found in the Intel Cherrytrail xhci vendor defined
>>>
Hi,
On 22-12-16 17:28, Mathias Nyman wrote:
On 22.12.2016 14:45, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 22-12-16 13:11, Felipe Balbi wrote:
Hi,
Hans de Goede writes:
Hi All,
Here are 2 patches which can and should be merged separately, but
which do belong together, as together they add support for
On 22.12.2016 14:45, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 22-12-16 13:11, Felipe Balbi wrote:
Hi,
Hans de Goede writes:
Hi All,
Here are 2 patches which can and should be merged separately, but
which do belong together, as together they add support for the
usb-phy / mux bits found in the Intel Cher
Hi,
On 22-12-16 14:18, Felipe Balbi wrote:
Hans de Goede writes:
Baolu has worked on this for months but it turned out that several folks
said 'no' to his patchset. You're not really dealing with a PHY, it's
just a portmux which can generate some UTMI messages to make sure dwc3
is happy.
Hi,
Hans de Goede writes:
>>> Here are 2 patches which can and should be merged separately, but
>>> which do belong together, as together they add support for the
>>> usb-phy / mux bits found in the Intel Cherrytrail xhci vendor defined
>>> extended capabilities registers.
>>>
>>> I did not want
Hi,
On 22-12-16 13:11, Felipe Balbi wrote:
Hi,
Hans de Goede writes:
Hi All,
Here are 2 patches which can and should be merged separately, but
which do belong together, as together they add support for the
usb-phy / mux bits found in the Intel Cherrytrail xhci vendor defined
extended capabi
Hi,
Hans de Goede writes:
> Hi All,
>
> Here are 2 patches which can and should be merged separately, but
> which do belong together, as together they add support for the
> usb-phy / mux bits found in the Intel Cherrytrail xhci vendor defined
> extended capabilities registers.
>
> I did not want
Hi All,
Here are 2 patches which can and should be merged separately, but
which do belong together, as together they add support for the
usb-phy / mux bits found in the Intel Cherrytrail xhci vendor defined
extended capabilities registers.
I did not want to hide an entire phy driver inside the xh
11 matches
Mail list logo
