On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 5:56 PM, Mathias Nyman
wrote:
> Quick Googling shows that that TI TUSB 73x0 USB3.0 xHCI host has an issue
> with halting.
>
> Errata says host needs 125us to 1ms between the last control transfer and
> clearing the run/stop bit. (halting the host)
>
> Suggested workaround i
On 19.09.2016 11:23, Joel Stanley wrote:
Hi Mathias,
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 4:33 PM, Greg KH wrote:
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 04:05:45PM +0930, Joel Stanley wrote:
We can't halt the secondary HCD, because it's also the primary HCD,
which will cause problems if we have devices attached to the p
Hello.
On 9/19/2016 9:35 AM, Joel Stanley wrote:
We can't halt the secondary HCD, because it's also the primary HCD,
which will cause problems if we have devices attached to the primary
HCD, like a keyboard.
We've been carrying this in our Linux-as-a-bootloader environment for a little
while n
Hi Mathias,
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 4:33 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 04:05:45PM +0930, Joel Stanley wrote:
>> We can't halt the secondary HCD, because it's also the primary HCD,
>> which will cause problems if we have devices attached to the primary
>> HCD, like a keyboard.
>>
>>
On 19.09.2016 09:35, Joel Stanley wrote:
We can't halt the secondary HCD, because it's also the primary HCD,
which will cause problems if we have devices attached to the primary
HCD, like a keyboard.
We've been carrying this in our Linux-as-a-bootloader environment for a little
while now. The ma
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 04:05:45PM +0930, Joel Stanley wrote:
> We can't halt the secondary HCD, because it's also the primary HCD,
> which will cause problems if we have devices attached to the primary
> HCD, like a keyboard.
>
> We've been carrying this in our Linux-as-a-bootloader environment f
We can't halt the secondary HCD, because it's also the primary HCD,
which will cause problems if we have devices attached to the primary
HCD, like a keyboard.
We've been carrying this in our Linux-as-a-bootloader environment for a little
while now. The machines all have the same TI TUSB73x0 part,
On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 08:31:29AM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-03-14 at 18:16 -0300, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote:
> > What seems to happen for the TI chip is that while the HID device is
> > still connected (ie, we still have pending URBs on the queue), halting
> > i
On Fri, 2014-03-14 at 18:16 -0300, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote:
> What seems to happen for the TI chip is that while the HID device is
> still connected (ie, we still have pending URBs on the queue), halting
> is not a great idea. And as described above, what is done right now
> is:
Can yo
We can't halt the secondary HCD, because it's also the primary HCD,
which will cause problems if we have devices attached to the primary
HCD, like a keyboard.
---
Not yet signed-off because I am waiting for some kexec testing to be
done on another environment, and I would like to bring this into a
10 matches
Mail list logo
