Hello.
On 6/1/2015 1:41 AM, Colin Ian King wrote:
From: Colin Ian King
If kzalloc returns null then isp1760_ep_alloc_request performs
a null pointer deference on req.
Dereference, not "deference".
Shall I send v2 for this stupid typo then?
Definitely, especially as your chang
On 31/05/15 23:15, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On 06/01/2015 01:00 AM, Colin King wrote:
>
>> From: Colin Ian King
>
>> If kzalloc returns null then isp1760_ep_alloc_request performs
>> a null pointer deference on req.
>
>Dereference, not "deference".
Shall I send v2 for this stup
Hello.
On 06/01/2015 01:00 AM, Colin King wrote:
From: Colin Ian King
If kzalloc returns null then isp1760_ep_alloc_request performs
a null pointer deference on req.
Dereference, not "deference".
No, it doesn't. It calculates the address of the 'isp1760_request::req'
instead, there
From: Colin Ian King
If kzalloc returns null then isp1760_ep_alloc_request performs
a null pointer deference on req. Check for null to avoid this.
Detected with smatch static analysis:
drivers/usb/isp1760/isp1760-udc.c:816 isp1760_ep_alloc_request()
error: potential null dereference 'req'. (