Re: [PATCH] usb: dwc3: core: clarify usb-phy array binding

2013-09-18 Thread Felipe Balbi
Hi, On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 05:46:10PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote: > > > > I even wrote a patch making USB3 PHY optional, but didn't push it > > > > exactly because it broke some other systems and I can't guarantee users > > > > won't mess up their DTS/pdata. > > > > > > Does that mean that their

Re: [PATCH] usb: dwc3: core: clarify usb-phy array binding

2013-09-18 Thread Mark Rutland
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 03:21:18PM +0100, Felipe Balbi wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 05:01:51PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote: > > > > So it's not physically possible for someone to just wire up a single phy > > > > to the device, either USB2-only or USB3? > > > > > > of course it is :-) I

Re: [PATCH] usb: dwc3: core: clarify usb-phy array binding

2013-09-18 Thread Felipe Balbi
Hi, On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 05:01:51PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote: > > > So it's not physically possible for someone to just wire up a single phy > > > to the device, either USB2-only or USB3? > > > > of course it is :-) In fact, TI has done it. But it causes a whole bunch > > of other problems to

Re: [PATCH] usb: dwc3: core: clarify usb-phy array binding

2013-08-28 Thread Mark Rutland
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 07:53:29PM +0100, Felipe Balbi wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 02:34:10PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 07:05:53PM +0100, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > > On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 01:42:15PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote: > > > > > > > > On Aug 9, 2013,

Re: [PATCH] usb: dwc3: core: clarify usb-phy array binding

2013-08-27 Thread Felipe Balbi
Hi, On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 02:34:10PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote: > On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 07:05:53PM +0100, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 01:42:15PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote: > > > > > > On Aug 9, 2013, at 11:28 AM, Mark Rutland wrote: > > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 04:

Re: [PATCH] usb: dwc3: core: clarify usb-phy array binding

2013-08-13 Thread Mark Rutland
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 07:05:53PM +0100, Felipe Balbi wrote: > On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 01:42:15PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote: > > > > On Aug 9, 2013, at 11:28 AM, Mark Rutland wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 04:40:32PM +0100, Kumar Gala wrote: > > >> The binding spec wasn't clear that the

Re: [PATCH] usb: dwc3: core: clarify usb-phy array binding

2013-08-12 Thread Felipe Balbi
On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 01:42:15PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote: > > On Aug 9, 2013, at 11:28 AM, Mark Rutland wrote: > > > On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 04:40:32PM +0100, Kumar Gala wrote: > >> The binding spec wasn't clear that the order of the phandles in the > >> usb-phy array has meaning. Clarify this

Re: [PATCH] usb: dwc3: core: clarify usb-phy array binding

2013-08-09 Thread Kumar Gala
On Aug 9, 2013, at 11:28 AM, Mark Rutland wrote: > On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 04:40:32PM +0100, Kumar Gala wrote: >> The binding spec wasn't clear that the order of the phandles in the >> usb-phy array has meaning. Clarify this point in the binding that >> it should be . >> >> Signed-off-by: Kumar

Re: [PATCH] usb: dwc3: core: clarify usb-phy array binding

2013-08-09 Thread Mark Rutland
On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 04:40:32PM +0100, Kumar Gala wrote: > The binding spec wasn't clear that the order of the phandles in the > usb-phy array has meaning. Clarify this point in the binding that > it should be . > > Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/dwc3

[PATCH] usb: dwc3: core: clarify usb-phy array binding

2013-08-09 Thread Kumar Gala
The binding spec wasn't clear that the order of the phandles in the usb-phy array has meaning. Clarify this point in the binding that it should be . Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala --- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/dwc3.txt | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git