On Sun, Feb 04, 2018 at 07:24:22PM +0100, Bjørn Mork wrote:
> Johan Hovold writes:
> >> IIRC I considered just dumping the BIT(x) into the .driver_info but
> >> then we'd only have 16 bits for each of send_setup and reserved on 32-
> >> bit arches and I wasn't sure that was enough. I've seen som
Johan Hovold writes:
> IIRC we have already started reusing entries, but the names have not
> always been made generic in the process. I think Bjørn may have proposed
> a generic naming scheme at some point, but that essentially just meant
> we encoded the two masks in the name.
Maybe. I dont' r
On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 04:35:34PM -0600, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Wed, 2018-01-31 at 16:32 -0600, Dan Williams wrote:
> > On Thu, 2018-02-01 at 09:17 +1100, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 09:56:01AM +0100, Kristian Evensen wrote:
> > > > Hi Johan,
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Jan 31
On Wed, 2018-01-31 at 16:32 -0600, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Thu, 2018-02-01 at 09:17 +1100, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 09:56:01AM +0100, Kristian Evensen wrote:
> > > Hi Johan,
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 7:38 AM, Johan Hovold
> > > wrote:
> > > > This will probably h
On Thu, 2018-02-01 at 09:17 +1100, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 09:56:01AM +0100, Kristian Evensen wrote:
> > Hi Johan,
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 7:38 AM, Johan Hovold
> > wrote:
> > > This will probably have to do for now, but we already have
> > > another
> > > blacklist
On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 09:56:01AM +0100, Kristian Evensen wrote:
> Hi Johan,
>
> On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 7:38 AM, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > This will probably have to do for now, but we already have another
> > blacklist struct with the same content which we could rename and
> > reuse.
>
> I noti
Hi Johan,
On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 7:38 AM, Johan Hovold wrote:
> This will probably have to do for now, but we already have another
> blacklist struct with the same content which we could rename and
> reuse.
I noticed the same, but wasn't quite sure about the policy on
renaming/recycling and add
On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 03:06:38PM +0100, Kristian Evensen wrote:
> The Quectel EP06 is a Cat. 6 LTE modem, and the interface mapping is as
> follows:
>
> 0: Diag
> 1: NMEA
> 2: AT
> 3: Modem
>
> Interface 4 is QMI and interface 5 is ADB, so they are blacklisted.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kristian Even
The Quectel EP06 is a Cat. 6 LTE modem, and the interface mapping is as
follows:
0: Diag
1: NMEA
2: AT
3: Modem
Interface 4 is QMI and interface 5 is ADB, so they are blacklisted.
Signed-off-by: Kristian Evensen
---
drivers/usb/serial/option.c | 7 +++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff
