Re: [PATCH] USB: fix endpoint-disabling for failed config changes

2012-11-11 Thread Greg KH
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 08:37:58PM -0500, Alan Stern wrote: > On Sat, 10 Nov 2012 starlight.201...@binnacle.cx wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > I'm wondering how long it will be before this > > patch appears in a 3.6.x release. Any idea? > > Probably a week or two. It's up to Greg KH. As it's real

Re: [PATCH] USB: fix endpoint-disabling for failed config changes

2012-11-11 Thread starlight . 2012q4
Just started a copies of /dev/urandom to the new drive mirror pairs (in preparation for crypt'ing them). This will take four days so I can't touch the system for a week now. No hurry on a 3.6 patch if you were contemplating one. Maybe 3.7 will be out by then anyway. >At 08:37 PM 11/10/2012 -05

Re: [PATCH] USB: fix endpoint-disabling for failed config changes

2012-11-11 Thread starlight . 2012q4
At 08:37 PM 11/10/2012 -0500, Alan Stern wrote: >Does the patch fix the problem? Morning and coffee motivated an attempt to build a kernel and try the patch. However it fails to apply for 3.6.6 --even caffine is not enough to inspire me to consider a -rc for production. Any chance for a 3.6 patc

Re: [PATCH] USB: fix endpoint-disabling for failed config changes

2012-11-10 Thread starlight . 2012q4
At 08:37 PM 11/10/2012 -0500, Alan Stern wrote: >Does the patch fix the problem? Will let you and the list know. Want to wait for a full kernel release. The drives go active if the power to the docks is toggled after they spin up--going with that for now. Will finish configuring the array and o

Re: [PATCH] USB: fix endpoint-disabling for failed config changes

2012-11-10 Thread Alan Stern
On Sat, 10 Nov 2012 starlight.201...@binnacle.cx wrote: > Hello, > > I'm wondering how long it will be before this > patch appears in a 3.6.x release. Any idea? Probably a week or two. It's up to Greg KH. > Any opinion on whether a 3.4.x or 3.2.x kernel > would be better than 3.6.x for a prod

Re: [PATCH] USB: fix endpoint-disabling for failed config changes

2012-11-10 Thread starlight . 2012q4
Hello, I'm wondering how long it will be before this patch appears in a 3.6.x release. Any idea? Any opinion on whether a 3.4.x or 3.2.x kernel would be better than 3.6.x for a production network backup system (i.e. super critical)? Or is 3.6 best? Running 3.1.8 at present. Seeing the timeout

[PATCH] USB: fix endpoint-disabling for failed config changes

2012-11-07 Thread Alan Stern
This patch (as1631) fixes a bug that shows up when a config change fails for a device under an xHCI controller. The controller needs to be told to disable the endpoints that have been enabled for the new config. The existing code does this, but before storing the information about which endpoints