On Thu, 2019-08-08 at 13:23 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 08, 2019 at 04:15:44AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Thu, 2019-08-08 at 11:41 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > On Thu, Aug 08, 2019 at 11:25:09AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > > Joe rightly points out that
On Thu, Aug 08, 2019 at 04:15:44AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Thu, 2019-08-08 at 11:41 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 08, 2019 at 11:25:09AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > Joe rightly points out that we should be using the "Obsolete" status for
> > > these two subsyste
On Thu, 2019-08-08 at 11:41 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 08, 2019 at 11:25:09AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > Joe rightly points out that we should be using the "Obsolete" status for
> > these two subsystems.
>
> Even with that change, I don't see get_maintainers.pl tell m
On Thu, Aug 08, 2019 at 11:25:09AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> Joe rightly points out that we should be using the "Obsolete" status for
> these two subsystems.
Even with that change, I don't see get_maintainers.pl tell me I
shouldn't be sending a patch in for this area:
$ cat x.patch
diff
Joe rightly points out that we should be using the "Obsolete" status for
these two subsystems.
Also I got the path name wrong for the wusbcore tree.
Reported-by: Joe Perches
Fixes: 71ed79b0e4be ("USB: Move wusbcore and UWB to staging as it is obsolete")
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman
diff -
