On Wed, 2014-07-02 at 17:53 +0200, Stefan Klug wrote:
> @@ -1471,6 +1526,57 @@ static int proc_do_submiturb(struct
> usb_dev_state
> *ps, struct usbdevfs_urb *uurb
> }
> totlen -= u;
> }
> +} else if(num_pages) {
> +pages = kmalloc(num_pages*sizeo
On Thu, 3 Jul 2014, Stefan Klug wrote:
> >> Questions/Notes:
> >> - I'm quite unhappy with the added member async::is_user_mem. Is there a
> >> better place
> >> where I could store this information?
> > No, async is the right place. Why are you unhappy about it?
> A whole byte for this flag
From: Stefan Klug
...
> Is there any way to check if the host controller supports arbitrary
> alignment?
> If I read the xhci spec correctly arbitrary alignment is explicitly
> permitted.
Not entirely.
The xhci spec has a few limits on the alignment of transfer buffer.
They seem to be designed to
On 02.07.2014 21:38, Alan Stern wrote:
On Wed, 2 Jul 2014, Oliver Neukum wrote:
Stefan Klug
Software Developer
Basler AG
An der Strusbek 60-62
22926 Ahrensburg
Germany
Tel. +49 4102 463 582
Fax +49 4102 463 46 582
stefan.k...@baslerweb.com
www.baslerweb.com
Vorstand: Dr.-Ing. Dietmar Le
On 02.07.2014 20:24, Alan Stern wrote:
Overall this implementation seems quite straightforward. However, it
appears that your email client has mangled the whitespace in the patch.
The patch contains many style violations; you should run it through
checkpatch.pl. It also has one or two mistake
On 02.07.2014 19:55, Greg KH wrote:
Very nice.
Thanks.
Minor non-technical issues here, your patch is corrupted (linewrapped
and tabs converted to spaces) and can't be applied at all. Can you fix
your email client and try again? Look at
Documentation/email_clients.txt for hints on how to do
On Wed, 2 Jul 2014, Peter Stuge wrote:
> > The kernel doesn't support scatter-gather for control transfers, only
> > bulk.
>
> That could possibly change, right, and then it would be nice to have
> zerocopy for free there as well?
No. ohci-hcd doesn't support control transfers larger than 4 KB
Alan Stern wrote:
> > > Also, many host controllers cannot handle arbitrary alignment.
> > > It would be best to require that the buffer start at a page boundary.
> >
> > This requires a bit of negotiation with userspace, maybe per-URB but
>
> I don't follow. What negotiation is needed? All t
On Wed, 2 Jul 2014, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-07-02 at 17:53 +0200, Stefan Klug wrote:
>
> > Implementation details:
> > The patch only touches drivers/usb/core/devio.c.
> > In procy_do_submiturb(), it is checked if zerocopy is allowed. This is
> > currently a rough
> > check which com
On Wed, 2 Jul 2014, Peter Stuge wrote:
> Thank you very much for working on this, Stefan.
>
> Alan Stern wrote:
> > Also, many host controllers cannot handle arbitrary alignment.
> > It would be best to require that the buffer start at a page boundary.
>
> This requires a bit of negotiation wi
On Wed, 2014-07-02 at 17:53 +0200, Stefan Klug wrote:
> Implementation details:
> The patch only touches drivers/usb/core/devio.c.
> In procy_do_submiturb(), it is checked if zerocopy is allowed. This is
> currently a rough
> check which compares the number of required pages to
> ps->dev->bus->s
Thank you very much for working on this, Stefan.
Alan Stern wrote:
> Also, many host controllers cannot handle arbitrary alignment.
> It would be best to require that the buffer start at a page boundary.
This requires a bit of negotiation with userspace, maybe per-URB but
it seems better to neg
On Wed, 2 Jul 2014, Stefan Klug wrote:
> Hi everybody,
> in short: The attached patch adds zerocopy support to the usbfs driver.
> I tested it on x86 and on a globalscale mirabox ARM board. Until now it
> works
> quite nice and I'd love to get some comments and feedback on the patch.
>
> Longer
On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 05:53:56PM +0200, Stefan Klug wrote:
> Hi everybody,
> in short: The attached patch adds zerocopy support to the usbfs driver.
> I tested it on x86 and on a globalscale mirabox ARM board. Until now it
> works
> quite nice and I'd love to get some comments and feedback on the
Hi everybody,
in short: The attached patch adds zerocopy support to the usbfs driver.
I tested it on x86 and on a globalscale mirabox ARM board. Until now it
works
quite nice and I'd love to get some comments and feedback on the patch.
Longer version: The usbfs driver does not support direct da
15 matches
Mail list logo
