On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 11:57:27AM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Apr 2016, Navin P.S wrote:
>
> > > You want to replace 2 statements with 8 statements that do exactly
> > > the same thing? This does not seem like an improvement.
> > >
> >
>
On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 10:38:37AM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Apr 2016, Navin P.S wrote:
>
> > I was proposing something like the attached.
> > When you have an oppurtunity to fix or be complaint let us use that so.
> >
> > I finally leave this he
On Sun, Apr 03, 2016 at 02:25:05PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Apr 2016, Navin P.S wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 8:00 PM, Alan Stern
> > wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2 Apr 2016, Navin P.S wrote:
> > >>regs->hostpc[(wIndex & 0xff) - 1];
&g
On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 8:00 PM, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Sat, 2 Apr 2016, Navin P.S wrote:
>>regs->hostpc[(wIndex & 0xff) - 1];
>
> You're asking the question backwards. wIndex is allowed to be 0
> because the USB spec says so. You can't argue with that.
>
&g
On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 9:19 PM, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Apr 2016, Navin P.S wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 8:00 PM, Alan Stern wrote:
>> > On Fri, 1 Apr 2016, Navin P.S wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> I was looking at
On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 8:00 PM, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Apr 2016, Navin P.S wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I was looking at the bug https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112171
>> which says
>>
>> Feb 08 22:58:56 x kernel: UBSAN: Undefined behaviou
Hi,
I was looking at the bug https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112171
which says
Feb 08 22:58:56 x kernel: UBSAN: Undefined behaviour in
drivers/usb/host/ehci-hub.c:873:47
Feb 08 22:58:56 x kernel: index -1 is out of range for type 'u32 [1]'
I'm suspective the ehci-tegra function ehc
