Hi Roger,
On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 20:01:38, Quadros, Roger wrote:
> but DT boot is not supported for OMAP USB Host. How did you get it to work?
>
> Are you testing the Host connector or the OTG connector?
If you see latest changes on musb_dsps.c, you will be able to find
out.
As beagle bone fi
Hi Roger,
On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 19:55:14, Quadros, Roger wrote:
> Thanks Afzal :). You mean the non device tree boot right?
No, dt boot, am335x can only dt boot.
Regards
Afzal
Hi Felipe, Roger,
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 18:49:17, Mohammed, Afzal wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 18:45:04, Balbi, Felipe wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 02:48:50PM +0200, Roger Quadros wrote:
> > > I would appreciate if someone who knows more about beaglebone c
Hi Felipe,
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 18:45:04, Balbi, Felipe wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 02:48:50PM +0200, Roger Quadros wrote:
> > I would appreciate if someone who knows more about beaglebone can help
> > with verification.
> >
> > I could find that Robert C Nelson (now in cc) is maintainin
Hi Roger,
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 18:18:50, Quadros, Roger wrote:
> On 01/30/2013 02:08 PM, Mohammed, Afzal wrote:
> > Please try to ensure that beagle bone USB0 works with this.
> I do not have beaglebone with me and don't seem to find beaglebone
> board support in mainli
Hi Roger,
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 17:00:01, Quadros, Roger wrote:
> NOTE: Tested on 4460ES-B1 Panda and BeagleBoard C4 only. Other boards are only
> build tested.
Please try to ensure that beagle bone USB0 works with this.
Regards
Afzal
Hi Michael,
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 03:10:05, Michael Grzeschik wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 11:15:05AM +0530, Afzal Mohammed wrote:
> > From: "B, Ravi"
> >
> > Added device tree support for nop transceiver driver and updated the
> > Documentation with device tree binding information for am
Hi Kishon,
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 17:21:45, Mohammed, Afzal wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 19:56:37, ABRAHAM, KISHON VIJAY wrote:
> > On Wednesday 23 January 2013 07:28 PM, Mohammed, Afzal wrote:
> > > USB first instance of am335x works in mainline as of now.
>
>
Hi Kishon,
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 19:56:37, ABRAHAM, KISHON VIJAY wrote:
> On Wednesday 23 January 2013 07:28 PM, Mohammed, Afzal wrote:
> > USB first instance of am335x works in mainline as of now.
> Can you check if this series indeed breaks am335x?
>
> Thanks for your he
Hi Koen,
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 22:32:56, Koen Kooi wrote:
> Actually it uses nop-phy as a phy, which is missing from
> arch/arm/boot/dts/am33xx.dtsi, so mainline is already broken. But adding the
> nop-phy to the DT is easy enough to patch in locally.
USB first instance of am335x works in m
Hi Felipe,
AM335x SoC's used in boards like beagle bone has two instances of USB
modules (2.0) at the hardware level, each having a dedicated phy.
Currently in mainline, only one instance of USB is supported
(including a fix in your latest pull request). To support multi
instance, the biggest obst
Hi Felipe,
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 20:15:22, Mohammed, Afzal wrote:
> "54db6ee ARM: OMAP2+: Introduce local usb.h" moved control module bit
> definitions from plat/usb.h (which dsps glue was using) to a local
> header in mach-omap2. And in parallel,
> "c68bb4c usb:
Hi Balbi,
On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 23:47:08, Balbi, Felipe wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 08:44:59PM +0530, Afzal Mohammed wrote:
> > This is a resend of remaining changes to get am335x usb working. These
> > were sent on 31 Oct with subject, "usb: musb: dsps: fixes for -rc.
>
> there is no mor
Hi Daniel,
* Daniel Mack, November 03, 2012 1:06 AM:
> I'm testing these patches with an AM33xx board that has the first musb
> port wired to an USB type A plug, but it doesn't yet work for me.
> So there is no host interface registered. I'm unsure on how to fix this,
> and I didn't get an answe
Hi Daniel,
* Daniel Mack, October 22, 2012 6:44 PM:
> [+ Sekhar, Vaibhav, Afzal]
> And what about these patches in general? I got bounces for the address
> Ajay Kumar Gupta who is the original author of most
> of them, and I wonder whether he isn't working for TI (and consequently
> on this pat
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 16:21:39, ABRAHAM, KISHON VIJAY wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 2:24 PM, Marc Kleine-Budde
> wrote:
> > I'm interested in to get these patches into the kernel soon. Kishon any
> > news on this patch?
> >
> >> Something like this would be required for USB support
> >> on
Hi Marc,
This is a query regarding patch,
"usb: otg: add device tree support to otg library" [1]
It seems there is so far no consensus on this change.
Do you have ideas to proceed on this ? is there something
that I can help you to proceed on this ?
Something like this would be required for USB
17 matches
Mail list logo
