gs like this:
>
> fs/fcntl.c: In function ‘send_sigio_to_task’:
> fs/fcntl.c:738:13: warning: statement will never be executed [-
> Wswitch-unreachable]
>siginfo_t si;
> ^~
>
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook
Acked-by: Jeff Kirsher
For the e1000 changes.
ter Senna Tschudin
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e100.c | 12 ++--
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
Acked-by: Jeff Kirsher
My only concern is:
- what hardware did this get tested with? Since this affects all e100
parts, it would be hard to believe that all the af
On Tue, 2014-11-11 at 12:48 -0500, David Miller wrote:
> From: Jeff Kirsher
> Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 09:28:24 -0800
>
> > On Tue, 2014-11-11 at 09:26 -0800, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> >> The Intel drivers were pretty much just using the plain vanilla GFP
> >
On Tue, 2014-11-11 at 09:26 -0800, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> The Intel drivers were pretty much just using the plain vanilla GFP
> flags
> in their calls to __skb_alloc_page so this change makes it so that
> they use
> dev_alloc_page which just uses GFP_ATOMIC for the gfp_flags value
value.
>
> Cc: Jeff Kirsher
> Cc: Matthew Vick
> Cc: Don Skidmore
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Duyck
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/fm10k/fm10k_main.c |2 +-
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c |2 +-
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixg
