Am Fri, 08 Feb 2008 03:20:26 +1030
schrieb David Newall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hans-Jürgen Koch wrote:
> > Am Fri, 08 Feb 2008 01:01:24 +1030
> > schrieb David Newall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> >>> It is not legally meaningless if copyright holder
Am Fri, 08 Feb 2008 01:01:24 +1030
schrieb David Newall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > It is not legally meaningless if copyright holders publicly state
> > how they interpret the license and what they consider a license
> > violation.
>
> Copyright-holders' opinions mean nothing. In the particular
Am Thu, 07 Feb 2008 23:49:42 +1030
schrieb David Newall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hans-Jürgen Koch wrote:
> > If somebody prefers an other OS for license reasons only, let them.
> > You cannot have open source software without open source license.
> > If a company ch
Am Wed, 6 Feb 2008 21:34:49 +0100
schrieb Christer Weinigel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> I also think that my customers, that decided to keep their kernel
> modules binary only, made a big mistake and have told them so. But I
> still think it's better for the Linux community to be a bit soft on
> su
