On Sat, 2023-06-24 at 22:05 +0200, Benjamin Berg wrote:
> On Sat, 2023-06-24 at 15:15 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > On Fri, 2023-06-23 at 16:34 -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Either way, the old patchset will give you a good idea about how it all
> > > > works, the changes are
On Sat, 2023-06-24 at 15:15 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Fri, 2023-06-23 at 16:34 -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Either way, the old patchset will give you a good idea about how it all
> > > works, the changes are mostly in the details. I am happy to push out a
> > > new version so
On Fri, 2023-06-23 at 16:34 -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
>
> >
> > Either way, the old patchset will give you a good idea about how it all
> > works, the changes are mostly in the details. I am happy to push out a
> > new version sooner rather than later if it might help with any efforts
> > on your
On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 2:14 PM Benjamin Berg wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 2023-06-22 at 21:41 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > On Thu, 2023-06-22 at 13:22 -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> > > I'm interested in getting UML working on Arm. Is anyone aware of any
> > > efforts to do this already?
> >
> > No
Hi,
Hi all,
I'm interested in getting UML working on Arm. Is anyone aware of any
efforts to do this already? I've not found anything searching around. Or
perhaps a port to any other arch as I'd imagine any 2nd arch will
require some refactorin
I am also quite interested in such a port. We may h
On 22/06/2023 21:13, Benjamin Berg wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 2023-06-22 at 21:41 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
On Thu, 2023-06-22 at 13:22 -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
I'm interested in getting UML working on Arm. Is anyone aware of any
efforts to do this already?
Not me ... But yeah, agree that it s
HI,
On Thu, 2023-06-22 at 22:23 +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> [SNIP]
>
> > At least a lot of the register handling, but that will always be
> > somewhat architecture specific.
> >
> > > ... , so perhaps it'd be easier to start with the seccomp-based model:
> > >
> > > https://patchwork.oz
[CC'ing Al]
- Ursprüngliche Mail -
> Von: "Benjamin Berg"
> An: "Johannes Berg" , "robh" ,
> "richard" , "anton ivanov"
>
> CC: "linux-um"
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 22. Juni 2023 22:13:56
> Betreff
Hi,
On Thu, 2023-06-22 at 21:41 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Thu, 2023-06-22 at 13:22 -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> > I'm interested in getting UML working on Arm. Is anyone aware of any
> > efforts to do this already?
>
> Not me ... But yeah, agree that it seems likely to require some
> refac
On Thu, 2023-06-22 at 13:22 -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm interested in getting UML working on Arm. Is anyone aware of any
> efforts to do this already?
Not me ... But yeah, agree that it seems likely to require some
refactoring, even if _some_ degree of attempts were made to keep
Hi all,
I'm interested in getting UML working on Arm. Is anyone aware of any
efforts to do this already? I've not found anything searching around. Or
perhaps a port to any other arch as I'd imagine any 2nd arch will
require some refactoring.
Thanks,
Rob
___
11 matches
Mail list logo
