Re: UML failing at "Failed to initialize default registers" on kernel 5.10

On Mon, 20 Jan 2025 10:56:36 +0100 Benjamin Berg wrote: > On Mon, 2025-01-20 at 07:07 +0100, Thomas Meyer wrote: > > > > > > Am 20. Januar 2025 00:25:35 MEZ schrieb Glenn Washburn > > : > > > Hi Benjamin, > > > > > > After applying the close_range patch, I'm now getting a failure at > > > runt

Re: UML failing at "Failed to initialize default registers" on kernel 5.10

On Mon, 2025-01-20 at 07:07 +0100, Thomas Meyer wrote: > > > Am 20. Januar 2025 00:25:35 MEZ schrieb Glenn Washburn > : > > Hi Benjamin, > > > > After applying the close_range patch, I'm now getting a failure at > > runtime where the last line printed from UML is "Failed to > > initialize > > de

Re: UML failing at "Failed to initialize default registers" on kernel 5.10

Am 20. Januar 2025 00:25:35 MEZ schrieb Glenn Washburn : >Hi Benjamin, > >After applying the close_range patch, I'm now getting a failure at >runtime where the last line printed from UML is "Failed to initialize >default registers". The host is on Debian 11 at kernel 5.10.216. I've >bisected th

UML failing at "Failed to initialize default registers" on kernel 5.10

Hi Benjamin, After applying the close_range patch, I'm now getting a failure at runtime where the last line printed from UML is "Failed to initialize default registers". The host is on Debian 11 at kernel 5.10.216. I've bisected the issue and it looks like the bad commit is: 3f17fed2149 ("um: swit