On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 09:31:10AM +0800, David Gow wrote:
> The most convenient workarounds (other than having newer gcc /
> binutils) are probably to either run against a different architecture
> (e.g. --arch x86_64) or to build with clang (--make_options LLVM=1).
> Those should be a bit more st
On Thu, 23 Mar 2023 at 09:08, Mark Brown wrote:
>
> I've been trying to do some stuff with KUnit but I can't seem to
> find a current tree where KUnit builds. Running on Debian stable
> starting from a clean -next tree and running:
>
>./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py config
>./tools/testing
I've been trying to do some stuff with KUnit but I can't seem to
find a current tree where KUnit builds. Running on Debian stable
starting from a clean -next tree and running:
./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py config
./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py build
based on Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/
