Re: UML for arm64

2023-06-24 Thread Johannes Berg
On Sat, 2023-06-24 at 22:05 +0200, Benjamin Berg wrote: > On Sat, 2023-06-24 at 15:15 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > > On Fri, 2023-06-23 at 16:34 -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Either way, the old patchset will give you a good idea about how it all > > > > works, the changes are

Re: UML for arm64

2023-06-24 Thread Benjamin Berg
On Sat, 2023-06-24 at 15:15 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Fri, 2023-06-23 at 16:34 -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > > > > > > > > Either way, the old patchset will give you a good idea about how it all > > > works, the changes are mostly in the details. I am happy to push out a > > > new version so

Re: UML for arm64

2023-06-24 Thread Johannes Berg
On Fri, 2023-06-23 at 16:34 -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > > > > > Either way, the old patchset will give you a good idea about how it all > > works, the changes are mostly in the details. I am happy to push out a > > new version sooner rather than later if it might help with any efforts > > on your

Re: UML for arm64

2023-06-23 Thread Rob Herring
On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 2:14 PM Benjamin Berg wrote: > > Hi, > > On Thu, 2023-06-22 at 21:41 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > > On Thu, 2023-06-22 at 13:22 -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > > > I'm interested in getting UML working on Arm. Is anyone aware of any > > > efforts to do this already? > > > > No

Re: UML for arm64

2023-06-23 Thread Benjamin Beichler
Hi, Hi all, I'm interested in getting UML working on Arm. Is anyone aware of any efforts to do this already? I've not found anything searching around. Or perhaps a port to any other arch as I'd imagine any 2nd arch will require some refactorin I am also quite interested in such a port. We may h

Re: UML for arm64

2023-06-23 Thread Anton Ivanov
On 22/06/2023 21:13, Benjamin Berg wrote: Hi, On Thu, 2023-06-22 at 21:41 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: On Thu, 2023-06-22 at 13:22 -0600, Rob Herring wrote: I'm interested in getting UML working on Arm. Is anyone aware of any efforts to do this already? Not me ... But yeah, agree that it s

Re: UML for arm64

2023-06-23 Thread Benjamin Berg
HI, On Thu, 2023-06-22 at 22:23 +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote: > [SNIP] >   > > At least a lot of the register handling, but that will always be > > somewhat architecture specific. > > > > > ... , so perhaps it'd be easier to start with the seccomp-based model: > > > > > > https://patchwork.oz

Re: UML for arm64

2023-06-22 Thread Richard Weinberger
[CC'ing Al] - Ursprüngliche Mail - > Von: "Benjamin Berg" > An: "Johannes Berg" , "robh" , > "richard" , "anton ivanov" > > CC: "linux-um" > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 22. Juni 2023 22:13:56 > Betreff

Re: UML for arm64

2023-06-22 Thread Benjamin Berg
Hi, On Thu, 2023-06-22 at 21:41 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Thu, 2023-06-22 at 13:22 -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > > I'm interested in getting UML working on Arm. Is anyone aware of any > > efforts to do this already? > > Not me ... But yeah, agree that it seems likely to require some > refac

Re: UML for arm64

2023-06-22 Thread Johannes Berg
On Thu, 2023-06-22 at 13:22 -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm interested in getting UML working on Arm. Is anyone aware of any > efforts to do this already? Not me ... But yeah, agree that it seems likely to require some refactoring, even if _some_ degree of attempts were made to keep