Quoting David Gow (2023-03-10 22:42:24)
> Hmm... I'd've thought that shouldn't be a problem: kunit.py should
> ignore most messages during a test, unless it can't find a valid
> result line. What does the raw KTAP output look like? (You can get it
> from kunit.py by passing the --raw_output option)
On Thu, 16 Mar 2023 at 08:45, Frank Rowand wrote:
>
> On 3/15/23 16:35, Frank Rowand wrote:
> > On 3/15/23 02:04, David Gow wrote:
> >> On Tue, 14 Mar 2023 at 12:28, Frank Rowand wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On 3/13/23 11:02, Frank Rowand wrote:
> On 3/11/23 00:42, David Gow wrote:
> > On Sat, 11
On 3/15/23 16:35, Frank Rowand wrote:
> On 3/15/23 02:04, David Gow wrote:
>> On Tue, 14 Mar 2023 at 12:28, Frank Rowand wrote:
>>>
>>> On 3/13/23 11:02, Frank Rowand wrote:
On 3/11/23 00:42, David Gow wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Mar 2023 at 07:34, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>
>> Quoting David
On 3/15/23 02:04, David Gow wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Mar 2023 at 12:28, Frank Rowand wrote:
>>
>> On 3/13/23 11:02, Frank Rowand wrote:
>>> On 3/11/23 00:42, David Gow wrote:
On Sat, 11 Mar 2023 at 07:34, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>
> Quoting David Gow (2023-03-10 00:09:48)
>> On Fri, 10 Ma
On Tue, 14 Mar 2023 at 12:28, Frank Rowand wrote:
>
> On 3/13/23 11:02, Frank Rowand wrote:
> > On 3/11/23 00:42, David Gow wrote:
> >> On Sat, 11 Mar 2023 at 07:34, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Quoting David Gow (2023-03-10 00:09:48)
> On Fri, 10 Mar 2023 at 07:19, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>
On 3/13/23 11:02, Frank Rowand wrote:
> On 3/11/23 00:42, David Gow wrote:
>> On Sat, 11 Mar 2023 at 07:34, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>>
>>> Quoting David Gow (2023-03-10 00:09:48)
On Fri, 10 Mar 2023 at 07:19, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>
>
> Hmm. I think you're suggesting that the unit tes
On 3/11/23 00:42, David Gow wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Mar 2023 at 07:34, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>
>> Quoting David Gow (2023-03-10 00:09:48)
>>> On Fri, 10 Mar 2023 at 07:19, Stephen Boyd wrote:
Hmm. I think you're suggesting that the unit test data be loaded
whenever CONFIG_OF=y and
On Sat, 11 Mar 2023 at 07:34, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>
> Quoting David Gow (2023-03-10 00:09:48)
> > On Fri, 10 Mar 2023 at 07:19, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Hmm. I think you're suggesting that the unit test data be loaded
> > > whenever CONFIG_OF=y and CONFIG_KUNIT=y. Then tests can chec
Quoting David Gow (2023-03-10 00:09:48)
> On Fri, 10 Mar 2023 at 07:19, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> >
> >
> > Hmm. I think you're suggesting that the unit test data be loaded
> > whenever CONFIG_OF=y and CONFIG_KUNIT=y. Then tests can check for
> > CONFIG_OF and skip if it isn't enabled?
> >
>
> More o
On Fri, 10 Mar 2023 at 07:19, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>
> Quoting David Gow (2023-03-02 23:15:04)
> > On Thu, 2 Mar 2023 at 09:38, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > >
> > > To fully exercise common clk framework code in KUnit we need to
> > > associate 'struct device' pointers with 'struct device_node' pointer
Quoting David Gow (2023-03-02 23:15:04)
> On Thu, 2 Mar 2023 at 09:38, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> >
> > To fully exercise common clk framework code in KUnit we need to
> > associate 'struct device' pointers with 'struct device_node' pointers so
> > that things like clk_get() can parse DT nodes for 'clo
On Wed, Mar 01, 2023 at 05:38:15PM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> To fully exercise common clk framework code in KUnit we need to
> associate 'struct device' pointers with 'struct device_node' pointers so
> that things like clk_get() can parse DT nodes for 'clocks' and so that
> clk providers can use
On Thu, 2 Mar 2023 at 09:38, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>
> To fully exercise common clk framework code in KUnit we need to
> associate 'struct device' pointers with 'struct device_node' pointers so
> that things like clk_get() can parse DT nodes for 'clocks' and so that
> clk providers can use DT to pro
13 matches
Mail list logo
