On Sat, 2024-10-26 at 20:59 +1300, Paulo Miguel Almeida wrote:
>
> when I said that "umid is already generated during make_umid_init
> __initcall", from my humble point of view, I was explaining the 'why'
> using UMID_LEN for calculation buffer sizes was redundant. Then again,
> once we know the s
On Sat, Oct 26, 2024 at 09:44:53AM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
Hi!
> On Sat, 2024-10-26 at 16:46 +1300, Paulo Miguel Almeida wrote:
> > umid is already generated during make_umid_init __initcall so there is
> > no need to allocate UMID_LEN bytes to accommodate the max possible name
> > for the um
On Sat, 2024-10-26 at 16:46 +1300, Paulo Miguel Almeida wrote:
> umid is already generated during make_umid_init __initcall so there is
> no need to allocate UMID_LEN bytes to accommodate the max possible name
> for the umid segment of the filepath
>
> This patch replaces UMID_LEN occurences in wh
