Hello David,
On Sat, 23 Nov 2024 16:27:27 +0900,
David Gow wrote:
> I had a chance to give this a proper try with KUnit, and think it'd be
> a great options to have available: it's certainly nice to have a fast,
> easy nommu architecture for testing.
thanks for the test.
> I'd echo the commen
On Mon, 11 Nov 2024 at 14:27, Hajime Tazaki wrote:
>
> This is a series of patches of nommu arch addition to UML. It would
> be nice to ask comments/opinions on this.
>
> There are still several limitations/issues which we already found;
> here is the list of those issues.
>
> - prompt configured
On Fri, Nov 22, 2024 at 12:49:45PM +, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> On 11/22/24 21:38, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 22, 2024 at 12:25:19PM +, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
> >> It's an ongoing maintenance burden, discussions about seeing whether it's
> >> feasible to remove it have been had
On 11/22/24 21:38, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 22, 2024 at 12:25:19PM +, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
>> It's an ongoing maintenance burden, discussions about seeing whether it's
>> feasible to remove it have been had in multiple places.
>>
>> I have personally run into issues having to ac
On Fri, Nov 22, 2024 at 12:25:19PM +, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
> It's an ongoing maintenance burden, discussions about seeing whether it's
> feasible to remove it have been had in multiple places.
>
> I have personally run into issues having to accommodate it on numerous
> occasions, as have man
On Fri, Nov 22, 2024 at 01:18:26PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Maybe I'm missing something, but where does this discussion about
> killing nommu even come from? Nommu is a long standing and reasonable
> well maintained part of the kernel, why would anyone want to kill it
> for no good reason
Maybe I'm missing something, but where does this discussion about
killing nommu even come from? Nommu is a long standing and reasonable
well maintained part of the kernel, why would anyone want to kill it
for no good reason? I know quite a lot of products shipping it.
Btw, nommu UML certainly so
On Fri, Nov 22, 2024 at 10:53:18AM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Fri, 2024-11-22 at 09:33 +, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
> >
> > In general, while I appreciate your work and don't mean to be negative, we
> > in mm consistently have problems with nommu as it is a rarely-tested
> > more-or-less hac
On Fri, 2024-11-22 at 09:33 +, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
>
> In general, while I appreciate your work and don't mean to be negative, we
> in mm consistently have problems with nommu as it is a rarely-tested
> more-or-less hack used for very few very old architectures and a constant
> source of pr
+ VMA people, mm list
On Mon, Nov 11, 2024 at 03:27:00PM +0900, Hajime Tazaki wrote:
> This is a series of patches of nommu arch addition to UML. It would
> be nice to ask comments/opinions on this.
In general, while I appreciate your work and don't mean to be negative, we
in mm consistently hav
Hello Anton,
thanks for the comment.
On Fri, 15 Nov 2024 19:26:07 +0900,
Anton Ivanov wrote:
> > What do others think? Would you use it? What for?
>
> I always thought of it as "another LKL". In that case, it can be compared
> to LKL on merit and if it is equivalent or better - go into kernel
Hello Johannes,
# added Geert, Greg, Rich to Cc (sorry if you feel noisy)
# here is the original email of this thread: just in case.
# https://lore.kernel.org/linux-um/cover.1731290567.git.thehaj...@gmail.com/
On Fri, 15 Nov 2024 19:12:39 +0900,
Johannes Berg wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2024-11-11 at 1
On 15/11/2024 10:12, Johannes Berg wrote:
On Mon, 2024-11-11 at 15:27 +0900, Hajime Tazaki wrote:
This is a series of patches of nommu arch addition to UML. It would
be nice to ask comments/opinions on this.
So I've been thinking about this for a while now...
To be clear, I'm not really _
On Mon, 2024-11-11 at 15:27 +0900, Hajime Tazaki wrote:
> This is a series of patches of nommu arch addition to UML. It would
> be nice to ask comments/opinions on this.
So I've been thinking about this for a while now...
To be clear, I'm not really _against_ it. With around 1200 lines of
code,
This is a series of patches of nommu arch addition to UML. It would
be nice to ask comments/opinions on this.
There are still several limitations/issues which we already found;
here is the list of those issues.
- prompt configured with /etc/profile is broken (variables are not
expanded, ${HOST
15 matches
Mail list logo
