Re: [PATCH v6 00/13] nommu UML

2025-01-16 Thread Hajime Tazaki
Hello, On Wed, 15 Jan 2025 18:30:41 +0900, Benjamin Berg wrote: > > > Maybe I am missing it, but I do not yet see proper FP register > > > handling. This will be needed for task/thread switches and also signal > > > emission/sigreturn. I am attaching the test program that I used to > > > verify

Re: [PATCH v6 00/13] nommu UML

2025-01-15 Thread Benjamin Berg
Hi, On Wed, 2025-01-15 at 09:25 +0900, Hajime Tazaki wrote: > On Wed, 15 Jan 2025 03:53:36 +0900, > Benjamin Berg wrote: > > > > On Tue, 2025-01-14 at 20:30 +0900, Hajime Tazaki wrote: > > > This patchset is another spin of nommu mode addition to UML.  It doesn't > > > change a lot since the last

Re: [PATCH v6 00/13] nommu UML

2025-01-14 Thread Hajime Tazaki
Hello, On Wed, 15 Jan 2025 03:53:36 +0900, Benjamin Berg wrote: > > On Tue, 2025-01-14 at 20:30 +0900, Hajime Tazaki wrote: > > This patchset is another spin of nommu mode addition to UML.  It doesn't > > change a lot since the last version (v5), but contain clean ups.  It would > > be nice to

Re: [PATCH v6 00/13] nommu UML

2025-01-14 Thread Benjamin Berg
Hi, On Tue, 2025-01-14 at 20:30 +0900, Hajime Tazaki wrote: > This patchset is another spin of nommu mode addition to UML.  It doesn't > change a lot since the last version (v5), but contain clean ups.  It would > be nice to hear about your opinions on that. > > There are still several limitation

[PATCH v6 00/13] nommu UML

2025-01-14 Thread Hajime Tazaki
This patchset is another spin of nommu mode addition to UML. It doesn't change a lot since the last version (v5), but contain clean ups. It would be nice to hear about your opinions on that. There are still several limitations/issues which we already found; here is the list of those issues. - m