On Tue, 2024-07-02 at 10:25 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> From: Anton Ivanov
>
> Since userspace state is saved in the MM process, kernel using
> FPU still doesn't really need to do anything, so this really
> is as simple as enabling preemption. The irq critical section
> in sigio_handler() needs
On 02/07/2024 11:18, Johannes Berg wrote:
On Tue, 2024-07-02 at 11:07 +0100, Anton Ivanov wrote:
Is that all we have left?
I think so, yes.
I lost track of your mm patches and they do not apply cleanly to master at
present.
Mine actually mostly went away, in favour of Benjamin's, but
On Tue, 2024-07-02 at 12:18 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
>
> We have 40 patches in patchwork now, including the 7 64-bit address
> space ones from Benjamin where I think some rework is needed. I've
> rebased/applied the other 33, I've just pushed that to the 'pending'
> branch:
>
> https://git.ker
On Tue, 2024-07-02 at 11:07 +0100, Anton Ivanov wrote:
>
>
> Is that all we have left?
I think so, yes.
> I lost track of your mm patches and they do not apply cleanly to master at
> present.
Mine actually mostly went away, in favour of Benjamin's, but his also
didn't apply cleanly due to th
On 02/07/2024 09:25, Johannes Berg wrote:
From: Anton Ivanov
Since userspace state is saved in the MM process, kernel using
FPU still doesn't really need to do anything, so this really
is as simple as enabling preemption. The irq critical section
in sigio_handler() needs preempt_disable()/pr
From: Anton Ivanov
Since userspace state is saved in the MM process, kernel using
FPU still doesn't really need to do anything, so this really
is as simple as enabling preemption. The irq critical section
in sigio_handler() needs preempt_disable()/preempt_enable().
Signed-off-by: Anton Ivanov
[
