On 15.02.23 16:55, Glenn Washburn wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 08:45:20 +0100
> Jan Kiszka wrote:
>
>> On 15.02.23 00:35, Glenn Washburn wrote:
>>> A running x86 UML kernel reports with architecture "i386:x86-64" as
>>> it is a sub-architecture. However, a difference with bare-metal x86
>>> kerne
On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 08:45:20 +0100
Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 15.02.23 00:35, Glenn Washburn wrote:
> > A running x86 UML kernel reports with architecture "i386:x86-64" as
> > it is a sub-architecture. However, a difference with bare-metal x86
> > kernels is in how it manages tasks and the current ta
On 15.02.23 00:35, Glenn Washburn wrote:
> A running x86 UML kernel reports with architecture "i386:x86-64" as
> it is a sub-architecture. However, a difference with bare-metal x86
> kernels is in how it manages tasks and the current task struct. To
> identify that the inferior is a UML kernel and
A running x86 UML kernel reports with architecture "i386:x86-64" as
it is a sub-architecture. However, a difference with bare-metal x86
kernels is in how it manages tasks and the current task struct. To
identify that the inferior is a UML kernel and not bare-metal, the
symbol "uml_kmalloc" is check
