On Thu, 2025-05-08 at 10:57 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > I dunno. I guess we can put rdtsc() into UML on x86 as I suggested about
> > the file placement, or we can also just fix the Kconfig there.
>
> The Kconfig solution looks much simpler to me too :)
>
> Patch attached, does this look go
* Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Thu, 2025-05-08 at 10:57 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > >
> > > I dunno. I guess we can put rdtsc() into UML on x86 as I suggested about
> > > the file placement, or we can also just fix the Kconfig there.
> >
> > The Kconfig solution looks much simpler to me too :)
* Johannes Berg wrote:
> +linux-um
>
> On Wed, 2025-05-07 at 18:40 +, tip-bot2 for Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > To resolve these kinds of problems and to allow to be included
> > on UML,
> > add a simplified version of , which only adds the rdtsc()
> > definition.
>
> OK, weird, why wou
