On Wed, 2024-06-05 at 19:59 +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>
> > > -ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
> > > +ifneq ($(or $(CONFIG_X86_64),$(CONFIG_X86_32)),)
> >
> > These configurations are mutually exclusive, so would it look more
> > readable to have it be:
> >
> >
> > ifeq ($(CONFIG_X86_32)$(CONFIG_X86_64)
On Wed, 5 Jun 2024 at 08:22, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
>
> Hi David,
>
> Just a fly by comment on style, I don't have much to say content :)
>
> On Wed, Jun 05, 2024 at 06:40:50AM +0800, David Gow wrote:
> > At present, Rust in the kernel only supports 64-bit x86, so UML has
> > followed suit. Howe
Hi David,
Just a fly by comment on style, I don't have much to say content :)
On Wed, Jun 05, 2024 at 06:40:50AM +0800, David Gow wrote:
> At present, Rust in the kernel only supports 64-bit x86, so UML has
> followed suit. However, it's significantly easier to support 32-bit i386
> on UML than o
At present, Rust in the kernel only supports 64-bit x86, so UML has
followed suit. However, it's significantly easier to support 32-bit i386
on UML than on bare metal, as UML does not use the -mregparm option
(which alters the ABI), which is not yet supported by rustc[1].
Add support for CONFIG_RU
