On Wed, Mar 19 2025 at 10:28, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> Hi,
>
> tl;dr if patches are agreed upon, I ask subsys maintainers to take the
> respective ones via their trees (as they are split per subsys), so that
> the IRQ tree can take only the rest. That would minimize churn/conflicts
> during merges.
So
On 06. 05. 25, 15:41, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Wed, Mar 19 2025 at 10:28, Jiri Slaby wrote:
Hi,
tl;dr if patches are agreed upon, I ask subsys maintainers to take the
respective ones via their trees (as they are split per subsys), so that
the IRQ tree can take only the rest. That would minimi
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
[PATCH 6.12] Revert "um: work around sched_yield not yielding in
time-travel mode"
to the 6.12-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The f
