Re: [PATCH RFC v2 04/29] mm: asi: Add infrastructure for boot-time enablement

2025-04-18 Thread Borislav Petkov
On Fri, Jan 10, 2025 at 06:40:30PM +, Brendan Jackman wrote: > Add a boot time parameter to control the newly added X86_FEATURE_ASI. > "asi=on" or "asi=off" can be used in the kernel command line to enable > or disable ASI at boot time. If not specified, ASI enablement depends > on CONFIG_ADDRE

Re: [PATCH v2 00/57] irqdomain: Cleanups and Documentation

2025-04-18 Thread Jiri Slaby
On 19. 03. 25, 11:21, Andy Shevchenko wrote: I am all to support the idea, but in some cases I would think of a bit more work to be done to get rid of the of_fwnode_handle(np) in favour of dev_fwnode(dev). Note, this is based on a brief look, I haven't any example at hand right now. Aah, that's

Re: [PATCH RFC v2 02/29] x86: Create CONFIG_MITIGATION_ADDRESS_SPACE_ISOLATION

2025-04-18 Thread Mike Rapoport
Hi Brendan, On Fri, Jan 10, 2025 at 06:40:28PM +, Brendan Jackman wrote: > Currently a nop config. Keeping as a separate commit for easy review of > the boring bits. Later commits will use and enable this new config. > > This config is only added for non-UML x86_64 as other architectures do >

Re: (subset) [PATCH v2 00/57] irqdomain: Cleanups and Documentation

2025-04-18 Thread Christophe Leroy
On Wed, 19 Mar 2025 10:28:53 +0100, Jiri Slaby (SUSE) wrote: > tl;dr if patches are agreed upon, I ask subsys maintainers to take the > respective ones via their trees (as they are split per subsys), so that > the IRQ tree can take only the rest. That would minimize churn/conflicts > during merge

Re: [PATCH v2 00/57] irqdomain: Cleanups and Documentation

2025-04-18 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 11:30 AM Jiri Slaby (SUSE) wrote: > > Hi, > > tl;dr if patches are agreed upon, I ask subsys maintainers to take the > respective ones via their trees (as they are split per subsys), so that > the IRQ tree can take only the rest. That would minimize churn/conflicts > during

Re: (subset) [PATCH v2 00/57] irqdomain: Cleanups and Documentation

2025-04-18 Thread Mark Brown
On Wed, 19 Mar 2025 10:28:53 +0100, Jiri Slaby (SUSE) wrote: > tl;dr if patches are agreed upon, I ask subsys maintainers to take the > respective ones via their trees (as they are split per subsys), so that > the IRQ tree can take only the rest. That would minimize churn/conflicts > during merges.

Re: [PATCH RFC v2 02/29] x86: Create CONFIG_MITIGATION_ADDRESS_SPACE_ISOLATION

2025-04-18 Thread Brendan Jackman
On Sat, Mar 01, 2025 at 09:23:51AM +0200, Mike Rapoport wrote: > Hi Brendan, > > On Fri, Jan 10, 2025 at 06:40:28PM +, Brendan Jackman wrote: > > Currently a nop config. Keeping as a separate commit for easy review of > > the boring bits. Later commits will use and enable this new config. > > >

[PATCH v2 2/2] um/asm: Replace "REP; NOP" with PAUSE mnemonic

2025-04-18 Thread Uros Bizjak
Current minimum required version of binutils is 2.25, which supports PAUSE instruction mnemonic. Replace "REP; NOP" with this proper mnemonic. No functional change intended. Signed-off-by: Uros Bizjak Cc: Richard Weinberger Cc: Anton Ivanov Cc: Johannes Berg Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Ingo Mol

[PATCH v2 1/2] um/asm: Rename rep_nop() to native_pause()

2025-04-18 Thread Uros Bizjak
Rename rep_nop() function to what it really does. No functional change intended. Signed-off-by: Uros Bizjak Cc: Richard Weinberger Cc: Anton Ivanov Cc: Johannes Berg Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Ingo Molnar Cc: Borislav Petkov Cc: Dave Hansen Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: David Laight --- v2: Ren