On Wed, Mar 12, 2025 at 04:56:59PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Mar 2025 at 06:56, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 07, 2025 at 04:28:15PM +0100, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 08:51:17PM +0200, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > > > From: "Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)
On Tue, 11 Mar 2025 at 06:56, Mike Rapoport wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 07, 2025 at 04:28:15PM +0100, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 08:51:17PM +0200, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > > From: "Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)"
> > >
> > > Allocating the zero pages from memblock is simpler because
On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 10:41:28PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Mar 2025 at 22:33, Mark Brown wrote:
> > [0.00] efi: UEFI not found.
> > [0.00] cma: Reserved 64 MiB at 0x
> > - I'd only been sampling the logs for the physical platforms, none of
> > which
On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 10:28:22AM +0100, Benjamin Berg wrote:
> From: Benjamin Berg
>
> Some file systems (e.g. ext4) may reuse inode numbers once the inode is
> not in use anymore. Usually hostfs will keep an FD open for each inode,
> but this is not always the case. In the case of sockets, thi