On Sun, Oct 13, 2024 at 11:43:41AM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > But why? That's pretty different from our normal style of arch hooks,
> > and introduces an indirect call in a security sensitive area.
>
> Will change to __weak hook.
Isn't the callback required when using the large ROX page?
On Sun, 13 Oct 2024 11:43:41 +0300 Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > > The idea is to keep everything together and have execmem_info describe all
> > > that architecture needs.
> >
> > But why? That's pretty different from our normal style of arch hooks,
> > and introduces an indirect call in a securit
On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 12:46:23AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 03:57:33PM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 09, 2024 at 11:58:33PM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 09, 2024 at 09:08:15PM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > > > /**
> > > > * st
