Re: [PATCH 1/6] arm64: Unconditionally call unflatten_device_tree()

Quoting Mark Rutland (2024-01-16 03:51:14) > Hi Stephen, > > On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 12:07:44PM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > Call this function unconditionally so that we can populate an empty DTB > > on platforms that don't boot with a firmware provided or builtin DTB. > > There's no harm in ca

Re: [PATCH 4/6] of: Create of_root if no dtb provided by firmware

Quoting Rob Herring (2024-01-15 12:32:30) > On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 12:07:47PM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > diff --git a/drivers/of/Kconfig b/drivers/of/Kconfig > > index da9826accb1b..9628e48baa15 100644 > > --- a/drivers/of/Kconfig > > +++ b/drivers/of/Kconfig > > @@ -54,9 +54,14 @@ config OF_F

Re: [PATCH 1/6] arm64: Unconditionally call unflatten_device_tree()

Hi Mark, On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 12:51 PM Mark Rutland wrote: > On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 12:07:44PM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > Call this function unconditionally so that we can populate an empty DTB > > on platforms that don't boot with a firmware provided or builtin DTB. > > There's no harm i

Re: [PATCH 1/6] arm64: Unconditionally call unflatten_device_tree()

Hi Stephen, On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 12:07:44PM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote: > Call this function unconditionally so that we can populate an empty DTB > on platforms that don't boot with a firmware provided or builtin DTB. > There's no harm in calling unflatten_device_tree() unconditionally. For bet