From: Johannes Berg
In 'basic' time-travel mode (without =inf-cpu or =ext), we
still get timer interrupts. These can happen at arbitrary
points in time, i.e. while in timer_read(), which pushes
time forward just a little bit. Then, if we happen to get
the interrupt after calculating the new time
On Wed, 2023-10-25 at 22:02 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Wed, 2023-10-25 at 21:51 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > On Wed, 2023-10-25 at 11:55 +, Vincent Whitchurch wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2023-10-23 at 09:33 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > > > Do you have a specific workload that tends to repr
From: Johannes Berg
In 'basic' time-travel mode (without =inf-cpu or =ext), we
still get timer interrupts. These can happen at arbitrary
points in time, i.e. while in timer_read(), which pushes
time forward just a little bit. Then, if we happen to get
the interrupt after calculating the new time
On Wed, 2023-10-25 at 21:51 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Wed, 2023-10-25 at 11:55 +, Vincent Whitchurch wrote:
> > On Mon, 2023-10-23 at 09:33 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > > Do you have a specific workload that tends to reproduce this?
> >
> > I've been seeing it when running roadtest,
On Wed, 2023-10-25 at 11:55 +, Vincent Whitchurch wrote:
> On Mon, 2023-10-23 at 09:33 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > Do you have a specific workload that tends to reproduce this?
>
> I've been seeing it when running roadtest, but it's easily reproducible
> without that by using the attached
On Mon, 2023-10-23 at 09:33 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> Do you have a specific workload that tends to reproduce this?
I've been seeing it when running roadtest, but it's easily reproducible
without that by using the attached config and the following program as
init.
cp repro.config .config
On Fri, 20 Oct 2023 at 17:22, Michał Winiarski
wrote:
>
> LLVM-based toolchain is using a different set of tools for coverage.
> Add an example that produces output in lcov format.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michał Winiarski
> ---
This looks good to me, minus a couple of very, very minor typos, and
the
On Fri, 20 Oct 2023 at 17:22, Michał Winiarski
wrote:
>
> Clang uses a different set of command line arguments for enabling
> coverage.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michał Winiarski
> ---
This works brilliantly here -- I'm very glad to finally be able to use
something newer than gcc 6!
I assume this will
