Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] GDB: Support getting current task struct in UML

2023-02-16 Thread Andrew Morton
On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 23:54:38 +0100 (CET) Richard Weinberger wrote: > - Ursprüngliche Mail - > > Von: "Andrew Morton" > > Thanks, but I'm not subscribed to linux-um and my usual > > get-it-from-lkml didn't work. > > > > Could we please have a resend, with a cc to linux-kernel? > > You

Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] GDB: Support getting current task struct in UML

2023-02-16 Thread Richard Weinberger
- Ursprüngliche Mail - > Von: "Andrew Morton" > Thanks, but I'm not subscribed to linux-um and my usual > get-it-from-lkml didn't work. > > Could we please have a resend, with a cc to linux-kernel? You can also get the patches in mbox format from: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/lin

Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] GDB: Support getting current task struct in UML

2023-02-16 Thread Andrew Morton
On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 08:51:52 +0100 Jan Kiszka wrote: > On 16.02.23 08:37, Glenn Washburn wrote: > > Added suggestions from Jan. > > > > Glenn > > > > Glenn Washburn (2): > > scripts/gdb: Correct indentation in get_current_task > > scripts/gdb: Support getting current task struct in UML > >

Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] GDB: Support getting current task struct in UML

2023-02-16 Thread Jan Kiszka
On 16.02.23 08:37, Glenn Washburn wrote: > Added suggestions from Jan. > > Glenn > > Glenn Washburn (2): > scripts/gdb: Correct indentation in get_current_task > scripts/gdb: Support getting current task struct in UML > > scripts/gdb/linux/cpus.py | 24 +++- > 1 file cha