+static LIST_HEAD(phy_list);
> +
Just noticed this via a quick glance - Seems that this variable is not
referenced by any of the compilation units, what's the purpose of it?
And as a static global in a shared private, each of the including
compilation units gets a copy, which I am not sure
that LSI officially supports that feature any more or willing to fix
any bugs for it in their firmware or driver. Is that right?
If so, we might as well remove that driver from the kernel.
--
Dan Aloni
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body
Applies for 2.6.20.7 and beyond.
Signed-off-by: Dan Aloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff --git a/include/scsi/scsi.h b/include/scsi/scsi.h
index 5c0e979..dff842a 100644
--- a/include/scsi/scsi.h
+++ b/include/scsi/scsi.h
@@ -103,6 +103,7 @@ extern const unsigned char scsi_command_size[8];
#
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 05:47:43PM +0200, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-04-19 18:10:54 +0300, Dan Aloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > diff --git a/include/scsi/scsi.h b/include/scsi/scsi.h
> > index 5c0e979..dff842a 100644
> > --- a/include/scsi/scsi.h
&g
On Wed, Jul 04, 2007 at 08:17:35PM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> Dan Aloni wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 02:51:58PM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> >> [..]
> >> Test machine was using MPTSAS driver for the following card:
> >> SCSI storage controller
perserve the original behaviour
of scsi_do_req() and add the request to the tail of the queue.
Signed-off-by: Dan Aloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff -p -urN a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
--- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c 2006-12-19 01:48:50.0 +0200
+++ b/driver
perserve the original behaviour
of scsi_do_req() and add the request to the tail of the queue.
Signed-off-by: Dan Aloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff -p -urN a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
--- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c 2006-12-19 01:48:50.0 +0200
+++ b/driver
Arjan van de Ven wrote:
On Tue, 2006-12-19 at 10:35 +0200, Dan Aloni wrote:
Hello,
scsi_execute_async() has replaced scsi_do_req() a few versions ago,
but it also incurred a change of behavior. I noticed that over-queuing
a SCSI device using that function causes I/Os to be starved from
Steven Hayter wrote:
Dan Aloni wrote:
Hello,
scsi_execute_async() has replaced scsi_do_req() a few versions ago,
but it also incurred a change of behavior. I noticed that
over-queuing a SCSI device using that function causes I/Os to be
starved from low-level queuing for no justified reason
9 matches
Mail list logo
