Re: INITIO scsi driver fails to work properly

2007-12-21 Thread Chuck Ebbert
On 12/19/2007 03:48 AM, Filippos Papadopoulos wrote: > On Dec 17, 2007 2:18 PM, Boaz Harrosh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I have found one problem. Please try patch [2] below and report. >> If it still fails try to enable debugging by setting with patch [1] >> these values at top of drivers/scsi/i

Re: INITIO scsi driver fails to work properly

2007-12-21 Thread Chuck Ebbert
On 12/21/2007 04:03 PM, James Bottomley wrote: > On Fri, 2007-12-21 at 14:30 -0500, Chuck Ebbert wrote: >> On 12/19/2007 03:48 AM, Filippos Papadopoulos wrote: >>> On Dec 17, 2007 2:18 PM, Boaz Harrosh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> I have found one problem. P

Re: INITIO scsi driver fails to work properly

2008-01-11 Thread Chuck Ebbert
; I havent reported "initio: I/O port range 0x0 is busy." > > Sorry ... we appear to have several reporters of different bugs in this > thread. That message was copied by Chuck Ebbert from a Red Hat > bugzilla ... I was assuming it was the same problem. > Our reporter has a

Re: Oops in megaraid_mbox_dpc(), kernel 2.6.23.9-85.fc8.i686

2008-02-07 Thread Chuck Ebbert
On 02/06/2008 02:38 PM, Yang, Bo wrote: > Andrew/Scott, > > Can you give me more details about this issue? Such as: MegaRAID > Controller name, FW version, RAID configuration, host system info, how > to reproduce this issue. Also do you see the issue on other kernel > versions. > He has hit

Re: Linux 2.6.22 released

2007-07-10 Thread Chuck Ebbert
On 07/09/2007 06:14 AM, Alan Cox wrote: > Are the shortlogs useful - yes .. they catch what appear to be mistakes > > Specifically: What happened to the aacraid ioctl security fix ? Did someone > decide it > wasn't needed or did it get lost somewhere on the way ? > > While this looks scary the o

Re: Problems with USB disk [solved]

2007-08-14 Thread Chuck Ebbert
On 08/13/2007 10:50 AM, Niels wrote: > On Sunday 12 August 2007 11:54, Niels wrote: > >> On Friday 10 August 2007 14:43, Niels wrote: >> >>> On Wednesday 08 August 2007 12:57, Ismail Dönmez wrote: >>> On Wednesday 08 August 2007 13:48:29 you wrote: > On Tuesday 07 August 2007 23:18, Greg

Megaraid driver not detecting RAID volumes in kernel 2.6.22?

2007-09-21 Thread Chuck Ebbert
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=288421 When running Fedora on a Dell 2950 w/ integrated LSI Perc5i (megaraid), the system will not boot after upgrading to 2.6.22. The boot message indicates the system is somehow seeing through RAID, cannot access logical volume. This causes the root

SCSI logging sucks

2007-02-07 Thread Chuck Ebbert
SCSI logging isn't documented very well, and what little there is has a problem: In Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt we have: scsi_logging= [SCSI] but it's really "scsi_logging_level", as seen here in drivers/scsi/scsi.c: module_param(scsi_logging_level, int, S_IRUGO|S_IWUSR); MO

Re: [patch] Re: SCSI logging sucks

2007-02-09 Thread Chuck Ebbert
works, but looking at scsi.c it would seem it doesn't. I only see add-single-device and remove-single-device in there. > From: Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Minor corrections and additions to 'scsi_logging_level', as pointed out > by Chuck Ebbert. > &

SCSI devices with 256-byte sectors don't work?

2007-02-26 Thread Chuck Ebbert
Apparently there really are such devices: Sep 28 20:05:42 localhost kernel: scsi4 : SCSI emulation for USB Mass Storage devices Sep 28 20:05:42 localhost kernel: Vendor: Sandisk Model: ImageMate SDDR09 Rev: 0100 Sep 28 20:05:42 localhost kernel: Type: Direct-AccessANSI SCSI

Re: Kernel 2.6.20 does not work anymore with SCSI or SATA on old Opteron / Xeon servers

2007-03-20 Thread Chuck Ebbert
Stefan Priebe wrote: > Hello! > > With the sysrq i've found the function with is the problem: > inode.c => nfs_getattr => nfs_sync_mapping_range > > I've also found the attached patch - which is not included in any stable > release nor in 2.6.21.X but is public since 20.02.07 > > I think this is

Re: Oops in scsi_send_eh_cmnd 2.6.21-rc5-git6,7,10

2007-04-05 Thread Chuck Ebbert
Andrew Burgess wrote: > The machine is x86_64 SMP. I also got the oops in the Fedora kernels: > 2.6.20-1.2933.fc6 and 2.6.20-1.3017.fc7. The system isn't locked solid but > it seems anything touching the scsi disks hangs. I also twice got this early > in the boot and it stopped booting. > > Any

Re: [BUG] unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 0800000e

2007-04-09 Thread Chuck Ebbert
Thomas Meyer wrote: > dmesg output: > > pktcdvd: pkt_get_last_written failed > BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 080e > EFLAGS: 00010203 (2.6.21-rc6 #295) > cdrom: This disc doesn't have any tracks I recognize! > > This happens while calling command pktsetup.

Re: [GIT PATCH] final SCSI updates for 2.6.21

2007-05-09 Thread Chuck Ebbert
James Bottomley wrote: > This should be the second half of the SCSI tree, mainly assorted driver > updates and fixes. The patch is available from: > Is Doug Chapman's patch for mptspi going in? http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=117857313402574&q=raw [PATCH] fix for BZ 8426 - massive slowdown on

[2.6.13-rc6-latest] SCSI disk registration msgs repeat themselves

2005-08-16 Thread Chuck Ebbert
I just added some usb-storage devices to my system and got the below. Why do the first four lines repeat for each device? (Not sure if this is a SCSI or USB problem.) [ 23.433725] SCSI device sda: 63424 512-byte hdwr sectors (32 MB) [ 23.560564] sda: Write Protect is off [ 23.560581] sda: