Re: [PATCH v4 1/7] target: use consistent left-aligned ASCII INQUIRY data

2018-11-30 Thread David Disseldorp
On Wed, 28 Nov 2018 17:23:07 -0800, Lee Duncan wrote: > > +* unused bytes at the end of the field (i.e., highest offset) and the > > +* unused bytes shall be filled with ASCII space characters (20h). > > +*/ > > + memset(&buf[8], 0x20, 8 + 16 + 4); > > I dislike that you are using

Re: [PATCH v4 6/7] target: remove hardcoded T10 Vendor ID in INQUIRY response

2018-11-30 Thread David Disseldorp
On Thu, 29 Nov 2018 08:35:26 -0800, Bart Van Assche wrote: > Where is the code that initializes dev->t10_wwn.vendor to "LIO-ORG"? Did I > perhaps overlook something? This is done in target_configure_device() . > Additionally, why are you using strnlen() for > a string of which it is guaranteed t

Re: [PATCH v4 6/7] target: remove hardcoded T10 Vendor ID in INQUIRY response

2018-11-30 Thread David Disseldorp
On Fri, 30 Nov 2018 14:17:49 +0100, David Disseldorp wrote: > > Where is the code that initializes dev->t10_wwn.vendor to "LIO-ORG"? Did I > > perhaps overlook something? > > This is done in target_configure_device() . Hmm, continuing to do it there may cause a bit of confusion if vendor_id is

Re: [PATCH v4 6/7] target: remove hardcoded T10 Vendor ID in INQUIRY response

2018-11-30 Thread Bart Van Assche
On Fri, 2018-11-30 at 15:41 +0100, David Disseldorp wrote: > On Fri, 30 Nov 2018 14:17:49 +0100, David Disseldorp wrote: > > > > Where is the code that initializes dev->t10_wwn.vendor to "LIO-ORG"? Did I > > > perhaps overlook something? > > > > This is done in target_configure_device() . > >

Re: [PATCH v4 1/7] target: use consistent left-aligned ASCII INQUIRY data

2018-11-30 Thread Lee Duncan
On 11/30/18 4:44 AM, David Disseldorp wrote: > On Wed, 28 Nov 2018 17:23:07 -0800, Lee Duncan wrote: > >>> +* unused bytes at the end of the field (i.e., highest offset) and the >>> +* unused bytes shall be filled with ASCII space characters (20h). >>> +*/ >>> + memset(&buf[8], 0x20,

[PATCH v5 1/5] target: use consistent left-aligned ASCII INQUIRY data

2018-11-30 Thread David Disseldorp
spc5r17.pdf specifies: 4.3.1 ASCII data field requirements ASCII data fields shall contain only ASCII printable characters (i.e., code values 20h to 7Eh) and may be terminated with one or more ASCII null (00h) characters. ASCII data fields described as being left-aligned shall have any

[PATCH v5 4/5] target: remove hardcoded T10 Vendor ID in INQUIRY response

2018-11-30 Thread David Disseldorp
Use the value stored in t10_wwn.vendor, which defaults to "LIO-ORG", but can be reconfigured via the vendor_id ConfigFS attribute. Signed-off-by: David Disseldorp Reviewed-by: Bryant G. Ly Reviewed-by: Lee Duncan --- drivers/target/target_core_spc.c | 8 +--- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+

[PATCH v5 0/5] target: user configurable T10 Vendor ID

2018-11-30 Thread David Disseldorp
This patch-set allows for the modification of the T10 Vendor Identification string returned in the SCSI INQUIRY response, via the target/core/$backstore/$name/wwn/vendor_id ConfigFS path. Changes since v4: - merge null-termination changes into a single patch - add patch to initialise t10_wwn ID de

[PATCH v5 5/5] target: perform t10_wwn ID initialisation in target_alloc_device()

2018-11-30 Thread David Disseldorp
Initialise the t10_wwn vendor, model and revision defaults when a device is allocated instead of when it's enabled. This ensures that custom vendor or model strings set prior to enablement are not later overwritten with default values. Signed-off-by: David Disseldorp --- drivers/target/target_co

[PATCH v5 2/5] target: consistently null-terminate t10_wwn strings

2018-11-30 Thread David Disseldorp
In preparation for supporting user provided vendor strings, add an extra byte to the vendor, model and revision arrays in struct t10_wwn. This ensures that the full INQUIRY data can be carried in the arrays along with a null-terminator. Change a number of array readers and writers so that they acc

[PATCH v5 3/5] target: add device vendor_id configfs attribute

2018-11-30 Thread David Disseldorp
The vendor_id attribute will allow for the modification of the T10 Vendor Identification string returned in inquiry responses. Its value can be viewed and modified via the ConfigFS path at: target/core/$backstore/$name/wwn/vendor_id "LIO-ORG" remains the default value, which is set when the backst

[PATCH 1/2] driver: scsi: ufs-qcom: fix returnvar.cocci warning

2018-11-30 Thread liujian
Remove unneeded variable used to store return value, detected by the semantic patch returnvar.cocci. Signed-off-by: liujian --- drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c index 3aeadb

[PATCH 2/2] driver: scsi: qla2xxx: fix returnvar.cocci warning

2018-11-30 Thread liujian
Remove unneeded variable used to store return value, detected by the semantic patch returnvar.cocci. Signed-off-by: liujian --- drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_mr.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_mr.c b/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_mr.c index

Re: DIF/DIX issue related to config CONFIG_SCSI_MQ_DEFAULT

2018-11-30 Thread John Garry
+ On 30/11/2018 01:19, Ming Lei wrote: On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 10:50:11AM +0800, chenxiang (M) wrote: Hi Lei Ming, 在 2018/11/27 21:08, Ming Lei 写道: On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 05:55:45PM +0800, chenxiang (M) wrote: Hi all, There is a issue which may be related to CONFIG_SCSI_MQ_DEFAULT: before

block layer API for file system creation - when to use multidisk mode

2018-11-30 Thread Ric Wheeler
On 11/30/18 7:55 AM, Dave Chinner wrote: On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 06:53:14PM -0500, Ric Wheeler wrote: On 11/29/18 4:48 PM, Dave Chinner wrote: On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 08:53:39AM -0500, Ric Wheeler wrote: On 10/6/18 8:14 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote: On 10/6/18 6:20 PM, Dave Chinner wrote: Can you

Re: block layer API for file system creation - when to use multidisk mode

2018-11-30 Thread Mark Nelson
On 11/30/18 12:00 PM, Ric Wheeler wrote: On 11/30/18 7:55 AM, Dave Chinner wrote: On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 06:53:14PM -0500, Ric Wheeler wrote: On 11/29/18 4:48 PM, Dave Chinner wrote: On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 08:53:39AM -0500, Ric Wheeler wrote: On 10/6/18 8:14 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote: On 10

[PATCH RFC 11/15] scsi: replace **** with a hug

2018-11-30 Thread Jarkko Sakkinen
In order to comply with the CoC, replace with a hug. Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen --- drivers/scsi/qlogicpti.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/scsi/qlogicpti.h b/drivers/scsi/qlogicpti.h index 884ad72ade57..f1785154061c 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi

Re: [PATCH RFC 00/15] Zero ****s, hugload of hugs <3

2018-11-30 Thread Kees Cook
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 11:27 AM Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > In order to comply with the CoC, replace with a hug. Heh. I support the replacement of the stronger language, but I find "hug", "hugged", and "hugging" to be very weird replacements. Can we bikeshed this to "heck", "hecked", and "he

Re: [PATCH RFC 00/15] Zero ****s, hugload of hugs <3

2018-11-30 Thread Davidlohr Bueso
On Fri, 30 Nov 2018, Kees Cook wrote: On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 11:27 AM Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: In order to comply with the CoC, replace with a hug. I hope this is some kind of joke. How would anyone get offended by reading technical comments? This is all beyond me... Thanks, Davidlohr

Re: [PATCH RFC 00/15] Zero ****s, hugload of hugs <3

2018-11-30 Thread Jens Axboe
On 11/30/18 12:56 PM, Davidlohr Bueso wrote: > On Fri, 30 Nov 2018, Kees Cook wrote: > >> On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 11:27 AM Jarkko Sakkinen >> wrote: >>> >>> In order to comply with the CoC, replace with a hug. > > I hope this is some kind of joke. How would anyone get offended by reading >

Re: [PATCH RFC 00/15] Zero ****s, hugload of hugs <3

2018-11-30 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
On 11/30/18 8:40 PM, Kees Cook wrote: > Better yet, since it's only 17 files, how about doing context-specific > changes? "This API is terrible", "Hateful interface", "Don't touch my > freakin' code", "What in the world were they thinking?" etc? Or just leave it as is because we're all grown up and

Re: [PATCH RFC 11/15] scsi: replace **** with a hug

2018-11-30 Thread James Bottomley
On Fri, 2018-11-30 at 11:27 -0800, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > In order to comply with the CoC, replace with a hug. > > Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen > --- > drivers/scsi/qlogicpti.h | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/qlogicpti.h b/drivers/s

Re: [PATCH RFC 00/15] Zero ****s, hugload of hugs <3

2018-11-30 Thread Matthias Brugger
On 30/11/2018 20:40, Kees Cook wrote: > On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 11:27 AM Jarkko Sakkinen > wrote: >> >> In order to comply with the CoC, replace with a hug. > > Heh. I support the replacement of the stronger language, but I find > "hug", "hugged", and "hugging" to be very weird replacemen

Re: [PATCH RFC 00/15] Zero ****s, hugload of hugs <3

2018-11-30 Thread David Miller
From: Davidlohr Bueso Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 11:56:52 -0800 > I hope this is some kind of joke. Whether or not it is a joke, it is censorship. And because of that I have no intention to apply any patches like this to any code I am in charge of.

Re: [PATCH RFC 00/15] Zero ****s, hugload of hugs <3

2018-11-30 Thread Michael Schmitz
Am 01.12.2018 um 09:12 schrieb Jens Axboe: On 11/30/18 12:56 PM, Davidlohr Bueso wrote: On Fri, 30 Nov 2018, Kees Cook wrote: On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 11:27 AM Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: In order to comply with the CoC, replace with a hug. I hope this is some kind of joke. How would anyon

Re: [PATCH RFC 00/15] Zero ****s, hugload of hugs <3

2018-11-30 Thread David Miller
From: Jens Axboe Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 13:12:26 -0700 > On 11/30/18 12:56 PM, Davidlohr Bueso wrote: >> On Fri, 30 Nov 2018, Kees Cook wrote: >> >>> On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 11:27 AM Jarkko Sakkinen >>> wrote: In order to comply with the CoC, replace with a hug. >> >> I hope thi

Re: [PATCH RFC 00/15] Zero ****s, hugload of hugs <3

2018-11-30 Thread David Miller
From: Abuse Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 20:39:01 + > I assume I will now be barred. Perhaps, but not because you said fuck. It would be because you're intentionally creating a disturbance on the list and making it more difficult for developers to get their work done and intentionally creating a

Re: [PATCH RFC 00/15] Zero ****s, hugload of hugs <3

2018-11-30 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Fri, 30 Nov 2018 20:39:01 + Abuse wrote: > On Friday, 30 November 2018 20:35:07 GMT David Miller wrote: > > From: Jens Axboe > > Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 13:12:26 -0700 > > > > > On 11/30/18 12:56 PM, Davidlohr Bueso wrote: > > >> On Fri, 30 Nov 2018, Kees Cook wrote: > > >> > > >>>

Re: [PATCH RFC 00/15] Zero ****s, hugload of hugs <3

2018-11-30 Thread Jarkko Sakkinen
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 11:56:52AM -0800, Davidlohr Bueso wrote: > On Fri, 30 Nov 2018, Kees Cook wrote: > > > On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 11:27 AM Jarkko Sakkinen > > wrote: > > > > > > In order to comply with the CoC, replace with a hug. > > I hope this is some kind of joke. How would anyone

Re: [PATCH RFC 00/15] Zero ****s, hugload of hugs <3

2018-11-30 Thread James Bottomley
On Fri, 2018-11-30 at 12:55 -0800, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 11:56:52AM -0800, Davidlohr Bueso wrote: > > On Fri, 30 Nov 2018, Kees Cook wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 11:27 AM Jarkko Sakkinen > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > In order to comply with the CoC, replace

Re: [PATCH RFC 00/15] Zero ****s, hugload of hugs <3

2018-11-30 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Fri, 30 Nov 2018 12:55:21 -0800 Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 11:56:52AM -0800, Davidlohr Bueso wrote: > > On Fri, 30 Nov 2018, Kees Cook wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 11:27 AM Jarkko Sakkinen > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > In order to comply with the CoC, re

Re: [PATCH RFC 00/15] Zero ****s, hugload of hugs <3

2018-11-30 Thread Jonathan Corbet
On Fri, 30 Nov 2018 12:55:21 -0800 Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > This a direct quote from the CoC: > > "Harassment includes the use of abusive, offensive or degrading > language, intimidation, stalking, harassing photography or recording, > inappropriate physical contact, sexual imagery and unwelcome

Re: [PATCH RFC 00/15] Zero ****s, hugload of hugs <3

2018-11-30 Thread Jarkko Sakkinen
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 11:40:17AM -0800, Kees Cook wrote: > On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 11:27 AM Jarkko Sakkinen > wrote: > > > > In order to comply with the CoC, replace with a hug. > > Heh. I support the replacement of the stronger language, but I find > "hug", "hugged", and "hugging" to be v

Re: [PATCH RFC 11/15] scsi: replace **** with a hug

2018-11-30 Thread Jarkko Sakkinen
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 12:21:07PM -0800, James Bottomley wrote: >Inappropriate language can be seen as a bug, though; such bugs will >be fixed more quickly if any interested parties submit patches to >that effect. Yes, exactly this part. I can add appropriate fixes tags but for most

Re: [PATCH RFC 00/15] Zero ****s, hugload of hugs <3

2018-11-30 Thread Jarkko Sakkinen
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 09:09:48PM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > Or just leave it as is because we're all grown up and don't freak out > when a piece of text contains the word "fuck". > > I still don't understand why people think that the word "fuck" is what > would keep certain groups

Re: [PATCH RFC 00/15] Zero ****s, hugload of hugs <3

2018-11-30 Thread Jarkko Sakkinen
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 09:31:13PM +0100, Matthias Brugger wrote: > Like John I don't think that the word "fuck" is something we have to ban from > the source code, but I don't care too much. Anyway, please don't change it to > something like heck as it might be difficult for non-english speaker to

Re: [PATCH RFC 00/15] Zero ****s, hugload of hugs <3

2018-11-30 Thread Jarkko Sakkinen
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 12:35:07PM -0800, David Miller wrote: > From: Jens Axboe > Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 13:12:26 -0700 > > > On 11/30/18 12:56 PM, Davidlohr Bueso wrote: > >> On Fri, 30 Nov 2018, Kees Cook wrote: > >> > >>> On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 11:27 AM Jarkko Sakkinen > >>> wrote: >

Re: [PATCH RFC 00/15] Zero ****s, hugload of hugs <3

2018-11-30 Thread Jarkko Sakkinen
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 01:01:02PM -0800, James Bottomley wrote: > No because use of what some people consider to be bad language isn't > necessarily abusive, offensive or degrading. Our most heavily censored > medium is TV and "fuck" is now considered acceptable in certain > contexts on most chan

Re: [PATCH RFC 00/15] Zero ****s, hugload of hugs <3

2018-11-30 Thread David Miller
From: Jarkko Sakkinen Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 13:42:33 -0800 > Can you tell how the CoC should be interpreted then? Regardless of what I think, as others have showen the CoC explicitly does not apply to existing code.

Re: [PATCH RFC 00/15] Zero ****s, hugload of hugs <3

2018-11-30 Thread David Miller
From: Jarkko Sakkinen Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 13:44:05 -0800 > On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 01:01:02PM -0800, James Bottomley wrote: >> No because use of what some people consider to be bad language isn't >> necessarily abusive, offensive or degrading. Our most heavily censored >> medium is TV and "fu

Re: [PATCH RFC 00/15] Zero ****s, hugload of hugs <3

2018-11-30 Thread Jens Axboe
On 11/30/18 2:47 PM, David Miller wrote: > From: Jarkko Sakkinen > Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 13:42:33 -0800 > >> Can you tell how the CoC should be interpreted then? > > Regardless of what I think, as others have showen the CoC explicitly > does not apply to existing code. And with that, can we pl

Re: [PATCH RFC 00/15] Zero ****s, hugload of hugs <3

2018-11-30 Thread Jarkko Sakkinen
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 01:48:08PM -0800, David Miller wrote: > From: Jarkko Sakkinen > Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 13:44:05 -0800 > > > On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 01:01:02PM -0800, James Bottomley wrote: > >> No because use of what some people consider to be bad language isn't > >> necessarily abusive,

Re: [PATCH RFC 00/15] Zero ****s, hugload of hugs <3

2018-11-30 Thread James Bottomley
On Fri, 2018-11-30 at 13:44 -0800, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 01:01:02PM -0800, James Bottomley wrote: > > No because use of what some people consider to be bad language > > isn't necessarily abusive, offensive or degrading. Our most > > heavily censored medium is TV and "fuc

Re: [PATCH RFC 00/15] Zero ****s, hugload of hugs <3

2018-11-30 Thread James Bottomley
On Fri, 2018-11-30 at 13:54 -0800, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 01:48:08PM -0800, David Miller wrote: > > From: Jarkko Sakkinen > > Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 13:44:05 -0800 > > > > > On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 01:01:02PM -0800, James Bottomley wrote: > > > > No because use of what s

Re: [PATCH RFC 00/15] Zero ****s, hugload of hugs <3

2018-11-30 Thread Jarkko Sakkinen
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 01:57:49PM -0800, James Bottomley wrote: > On Fri, 2018-11-30 at 13:44 -0800, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 01:01:02PM -0800, James Bottomley wrote: > > > No because use of what some people consider to be bad language > > > isn't necessarily abusive, off

Re: [PATCH RFC 00/15] Zero ****s, hugload of hugs <3

2018-11-30 Thread Jonathan Corbet
On Fri, 30 Nov 2018 14:12:19 -0800 Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > As a maintainer myself (and based on somewhat disturbed feedback from > other maintainers) I can only make the conclusion that nobody knows what > the responsibility part here means. > > I would interpret, if I read it like at lawyer at

Re: [PATCH RFC 00/15] Zero ****s, hugload of hugs <3

2018-11-30 Thread Jarkko Sakkinen
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 03:14:59PM -0700, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > On Fri, 30 Nov 2018 14:12:19 -0800 > Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > > As a maintainer myself (and based on somewhat disturbed feedback from > > other maintainers) I can only make the conclusion that nobody knows what > > the responsib

Re: [PATCH RFC 00/15] Zero ****s, hugload of hugs <3

2018-11-30 Thread James Bottomley
On Fri, 2018-11-30 at 14:12 -0800, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: [...] > I pasted this already to another response and this was probably the > part that ignited me to send the patch set (was a few days ago, so > had to revisit to find the exact paragraph): I replied in to the other thread. > "Maintainer

Re: [PATCH RFC 00/15] Zero ****s, hugload of hugs <3

2018-11-30 Thread Jarkko Sakkinen
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 02:26:05PM -0800, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 03:14:59PM -0700, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > > On Fri, 30 Nov 2018 14:12:19 -0800 > > Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > > > > As a maintainer myself (and based on somewhat disturbed feedback from > > > other maintai

Re: [PATCH RFC 00/15] Zero ****s, hugload of hugs <3

2018-11-30 Thread James Bottomley
On Fri, 2018-11-30 at 14:26 -0800, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 03:14:59PM -0700, Jonathan Corbet wrote: [...] > > Have you read Documentation/process/code-of-conduct- > > interpretation.rst? > > As has been pointed out, it contains a clear answer to how things > > should be in

Re: [PATCH RFC 00/15] Zero ****s, hugload of hugs <3

2018-11-30 Thread Jarkko Sakkinen
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 02:30:45PM -0800, James Bottomley wrote: > On Fri, 2018-11-30 at 14:26 -0800, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 03:14:59PM -0700, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > [...] > > > Have you read Documentation/process/code-of-conduct- > > > interpretation.rst? > > > As ha

Re: [PATCH RFC 00/15] Zero ****s, hugload of hugs <3

2018-11-30 Thread Jarkko Sakkinen
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 02:40:19PM -0800, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > Got you... Well I now read the 2nd amendment now through, and yeah, kind > of way I work/function anyway. Ugh, looked up the word from dictionary for something that makes additions to some guidelines because did not know the englis

Re: [PATCH RFC 00/15] Zero ****s, hugload of hugs <3

2018-11-30 Thread Jarkko Sakkinen
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 08:39:01PM +, Abuse wrote: > On Friday, 30 November 2018 20:35:07 GMT David Miller wrote: > > From: Jens Axboe > > Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 13:12:26 -0700 > > > > > On 11/30/18 12:56 PM, Davidlohr Bueso wrote: > > >> On Fri, 30 Nov 2018, Kees Cook wrote: > > >> > > >>>

Re: block layer API for file system creation - when to use multidisk mode

2018-11-30 Thread Dave Chinner
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 01:00:52PM -0500, Ric Wheeler wrote: > On 11/30/18 7:55 AM, Dave Chinner wrote: > >On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 06:53:14PM -0500, Ric Wheeler wrote: > >>Other file systems also need to > >>accommodate/probe behind the fictitious visible storage device > >>layer... Specifically, i

Re: [PATCH] iscsi: Capture iscsi debug messages using tracepoints

2018-11-30 Thread Douglas Gilbert
Hi, Misplaced semi-colons below. On 2018-11-26 8:01 p.m., Lee Duncan wrote: On 11/21/18 9:04 AM, fred.her...@oracle.com wrote: From: Fred Herard This commit enhances iscsi initiator modules to capture iscsi debug messages using linux kernel tracepoint facility: https://www.kernel.org/doc/Doc