On Sunday 19 February 2017 00:27:55 Finn Thain wrote:
> On Sat, 18 Feb 2017, Ondrej Zary wrote:
> > On Friday 17 February 2017 23:38:12 Finn Thain wrote:
> > > On Thu, 16 Feb 2017, Ondrej Zary wrote:
> > > > On Tuesday 31 January 2017 02:31:45 Finn Thain wrote:
> > > > [...]
> > > >
> > > > > Are y
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60644
--- Comment #52 from o...@ojab.ru ---
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=ffdadd68af5a397b8a52289ab39d62e1acb39e63
Patch is merged, bug can be closed.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watchin
On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 07:15:27AM +, Al Viro wrote:
> The root cause is unfixable without access to TARDIS and dose of
> antipsychotics sufficient to prevent /dev/sg API creation.
>
> What happens is that write to /dev/sg is given a request with non-zero
> ->iovec_count combined with zero ->d
On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 7:41 AM, James Bottomley
wrote:
>
> It is a kernel bug and it should not be user triggerable, so it should
> have a warn_on or bug_on.
Hell NO.
Christ, James, listen to yourself. What you are basically saying when
you say it should be a BUG_ON() is
"This shouldn't happe
On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 11:15 PM, Al Viro wrote:
>
> AFAICS, the minimal fix would be something like this:
Applied, along with getting rid of the BUG_ON() that made this bug
much worse than it would have been without it.
Linus
Reorder 'out_free' and 'out_free_devt' error handling labels in order to
match the way resources have been allocated.
Fixes: 0dba1314d4f8 ("scsi, block: fix duplicate bdi name registration crashes")
Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET
---
drivers/scsi/sd.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(
On Sun, 19 Feb 2017, Ondrej Zary wrote:
>
> These two patches are enough to make PDMA work with CD-ROM drives on
> 53C400(A), with IRQ enabled or not. They even improve transfer rates
> with HDDs because of bigger block size.
>
Nice! This is a great improvement.
> But DTC436 breaks with CDU
Applied to net-next, thanks.
Christoph,
On 2/17/17 17:25, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Looks fine,
>
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig
Thanks.
Martin, James,
It looks like this patch did not make it into final 4.10.
This is really bad. Now ZBC support is broken from the start on mpt3sas
HBAs (so a huge chunk of the market).
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 04:43:56PM -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
> This seems to be related to a 0day test we got on the block tree,
> details here:
>
> http://marc.info/?t=14862406881
>
> I root caused the above to something not being released when it should
> be, so it looks like you have t
10 matches
Mail list logo
