On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 12:35:32AM +, KY Srinivasan wrote:
> Windows has chosen this model for virtualizing FC devices to the guest -
> without rports (or vports). As I noted in my earlier email, James came
> up with this notion of a lightweight template almost a year ago. We can
> certainly pi
Remove a piece of code in storvsc_queuecommand that tries to pass the
physical address of the kernel struct scatterlist pointer to the host.
Fortunately the code can't ever be reached anyway.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig
---
drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c | 7 ---
1 file changed, 7 deletion
Hi Bart,
thanks for the analysis. I think the main issue here is that we shouldn't
try to assign affinity masks if there are not affinity vectors left to
assign.
Does the patch below fix the issue for you?
diff --git a/drivers/pci/msi.c b/drivers/pci/msi.c
index 50c5003..96c0713 100644
--- a/dr
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=176951
--- Comment #20 from Martin Goyot ---
A new Bios update is available on Acer's website:
https://www.acer.com/ac/en/GB/content/support-product/6917?b=1
v1.08 apparently. If anyone has tried it, does it solve the remaining problems?
--
You are r
On Sun, 2017-01-29 at 10:07 +0100, h...@lst.de wrote:
> Hi Bart,
>
> thanks for the analysis. I think the main issue here is that we shouldn't
> try to assign affinity masks if there are not affinity vectors left to
> assign.
>
> Does the patch below fix the issue for you?
>
> diff --git a/driv
On Wednesday 11 January 2017 16:23:29 Alan Stern wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Jan 2017, James Bottomley wrote:
> > On Tue, 2017-01-10 at 16:00 -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> > > In theory, I suppose we could change the kernel so that it would
> > > default to READ CAPACITY(16) for devices that report a SCSI lev
Hi Finn,
Am 16.01.2017 um 12:50 schrieb Finn Thain:
> This series removes some unused code and related comments,
> addresses the warnings generated by 'make W=1' and 'make C=1'
> and fixes a theoretical bug in the bus reset method in atari_scsi.
>
> There's also a patch to add a missing error ch
On Mon, 30 Jan 2017, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > Michael, Ondrej, can I get you to review/test please?
>
> No regressions during testing on my Falcon both using default settings,
> i.e. can_queue=1 or internal queueing (can_queue=4, cmd_per_lun=2), and
> the legacy IDE driver.
>
> I've seen a
On 01/27/2017 10:27 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-01-25 at 18:25 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> this series splits the support for SCSI passthrough commands from the
>> main struct request used all over the block layer into a separate
>> scsi_request structure that drivers that want
On 01/29/2017 05:58 AM, Dan Williams wrote:
> Warnings of the following form occur because scsi reuses a devt number
> while the block layer still has it referenced as the name of the bdi
> [1]:
>
> WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 93 at fs/sysfs/dir.c:31 sysfs_warn_dup+0x62/0x80
> sysfs: cannot create dupl
Hello,
The following program triggers use-after-free in sg_start_req:
https://gist.githubusercontent.com/dvyukov/be6561d2819fe30a78711234e53866b8/raw/1d75d4508f7a8ebb0b1ec0d18c0054fbffbc0708/gistfile1.txt
BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in bio_copy_user_iov+0xee1/0xf00
block/bio.c:1248 at addr 880
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 08:05:52AM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> On 01/29/2017 05:58 AM, Dan Williams wrote:
> > Warnings of the following form occur because scsi reuses a devt number
> > while the block layer still has it referenced as the name of the bdi
> > [1]:
> >
> > WARNING: CPU: 1 PID:
On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 11:22 PM, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 08:05:52AM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>> On 01/29/2017 05:58 AM, Dan Williams wrote:
>> > Warnings of the following form occur because scsi reuses a devt number
>> > while the block layer still has it referenced as
13 matches
Mail list logo
