On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 09:38:53AM -0800, Lee Duncan wrote:
> The scsi_transport_iscsi module already uses the ida_simple
> routines for managing the target ID, if requested to do
> so. This change replaces an ever-increasing atomic integer
> that tracks the session ID itself with the ida_simple
>
On Thu, 2016-02-25 at 11:38 +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 7:28 AM, John David Anglin <
> dave.ang...@bell.net> wrote:
> > On 2016-02-24, at 4:36 PM, Helge Deller wrote:
> >
> > > Maybe Dave has more luck, otherwise I'll continue to try to get
> > > some info.
> >
> > I tried yo
Implement module parameter 'rd_mem_size' to restrict the overall
allocated memory size and 'rd_lowat_thresh' to add a low water mark
signalling.
Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke
---
drivers/block/brd.c | 53 +
1 file changed, 53 insertions(+)
di
Enable sending of a 'low water mark' disk event and add
supporting infrastructure to the DM core.
Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke
---
drivers/md/dm-thin.c | 2 ++
drivers/md/dm.c | 27 +++
drivers/md/dm.h | 3 ++-
3 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-
Some SCSI events relate to block events (eg media change), so this
patch implements a forwarding mechanism for SCSI events to the
corresponding block event.
It redefines the currently unused 'supported_events' bitmap to
signal which SCSI events should be forwarded to block events.
Signed-off-by: H
Hi all,
here is a patchset to implement 'low water mark' disk events.
This event corresponds to a TP Soft Threshold Reached UA for
SCSI or a 'low watermark' event for dm-thin.
It utilises the existing 'disk event' infrastructure from the
blocklayer to send out the events via udev.
And it also clea
Add a disk event for a 'low water mark' condition, signalling when
a device is about to run out of space. This event is mapped to a
Thin Provisioning Soft Threshold Reached UA.
Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke
---
block/genhd.c | 2 ++
drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c | 10 +-
drivers/sc
cdrom.c : cdrom_get_last_written() yields up to 3 different values
--
Full description of the problem:
Depending on the capabilities of the optical drive involved, the function
cdrom_get_last_written() can yield up to 3 different
On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 7:22 AM, Martin K. Petersen
wrote:
>> "Lars-Peter" == Lars-Peter Clausen writes:
>
> Lars-Peter> Calling synchronize_irq() right before free_irq() is quite
> Lars-Peter> useless. On one hand the IRQ can easily fire again before
> Lars-Peter> free_irq() is entered, on th
This patch exposes the ioctl interface for UFS driver via SCSI device
ioctl interface. As of now UFS driver would provide the ioctl for query
interface to connected UFS device.
Reviewed-by: Subhash Jadavani
Signed-off-by: Dolev Raviv
Signed-off-by: Gilad Broner
Signed-off-by: Yaniv Gardi
---
This patch exposes the ioctl interface for UFS driver via SCSI device
ioctl interface. As of now UFS driver would provide the ioctl for query
interface to connected UFS device.
Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann
Reviewed-by: Subhash Jadavani
Signed-off-by: Dolev Raviv
Signed-off-by: Noa Rubens
Signed-
This patch exposes the ioctl interface for UFS driver via SCSI device
ioctl interface. As of now UFS driver would provide the ioctl for query
interface to connected UFS device.
Reviewed-by: Subhash Jadavani
Signed-off-by: Dolev Raviv
Signed-off-by: Gilad Broner
Signed-off-by: Yaniv Gardi
---
On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 8:55 PM, James Bottomley
wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-02-25 at 11:38 +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 7:28 AM, John David Anglin <
>> dave.ang...@bell.net> wrote:
>> > On 2016-02-24, at 4:36 PM, Helge Deller wrote:
>> >
>> > > Maybe Dave has more luck, otherwise I'
你的老朋友邀你来Q群:343257759
On 2016-03-09 9:43 AM, Ming Lei wrote:
We've provided all the information you asked for, what's the next step
>on this, or do we have to unwind the bio splitting code with reverts
>until it starts working?
John, Helge, and I did discuss the problem for a while privately, and looks
it is related
On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 11:15 PM, John David Anglin wrote:
> On 2016-03-09 9:43 AM, Ming Lei wrote:
>>>
>>> We've provided all the information you asked for, what's the next step
>>> >on this, or do we have to unwind the bio splitting code with reverts
>>> >until it starts working?
>>
>> John, Helg
On Thu, 2016-03-03 at 00:31 -0500, Douglas Gilbert wrote:
> This patch is in response to this report:
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-scsi/msg93456.html
>
> One of the strange things that the original sg driver did was let
> the user provide both a data-out buffer (it followed the
> sg_he
On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 04:11:33PM +0200, Yaniv Gardi wrote:
> This patch exposes the ioctl interface for UFS driver via SCSI device
> ioctl interface. As of now UFS driver would provide the ioctl for query
> interface to connected UFS device.
>
> Reviewed-by: Subhash Jadavani
> Signed-off-by: Do
Hi Christoph,
I've received a bug report that uas is causing a 2-disk enclosure to
lookup with 4.4 and later:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315013
Looking at the dmesg this stands out:
Mar 09 01:55:21 larry kernel: sd 2:0:0:1: [sdc] tag#31 uas_eh_abort_handler 0
uas-tag 32 infl
On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 06:58:48PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> So my question is how do I tell the scsi layer to not submit more then X
> commands with
> scsi_init_shared_tag_map() gone ?
By setting ->can_queue in the Scsi_Host structure to the maximum number
of command you want outstanding for
Hi,
On 09-03-16 19:26, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 06:58:48PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
So my question is how do I tell the scsi layer to not submit more then X
commands with
scsi_init_shared_tag_map() gone ?
By setting ->can_queue in the Scsi_Host structure to the max
On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 07:28:06PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> >By setting ->can_queue in the Scsi_Host structure to the maximum number
> >of command you want outstanding for this host.
>
> Can I lower this after calling scsi_host_alloc(), or do I need to make
> my template "dynamic" ?
You don'
> On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 04:11:33PM +0200, Yaniv Gardi wrote:
>> This patch exposes the ioctl interface for UFS driver via SCSI device
>> ioctl interface. As of now UFS driver would provide the ioctl for query
>> interface to connected UFS device.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Subhash Jadavani
>> Signed-off
> On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 04:11:33PM +0200, Yaniv Gardi wrote:
>> This patch exposes the ioctl interface for UFS driver via SCSI device
>> ioctl interface. As of now UFS driver would provide the ioctl for query
>> interface to connected UFS device.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Subhash Jadavani
>> Signed-off
On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 07:09:49PM -, yga...@codeaurora.org wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 04:11:33PM +0200, Yaniv Gardi wrote:
> >> This patch exposes the ioctl interface for UFS driver via SCSI device
> >> ioctl interface. As of now UFS driver would provide the ioctl for query
> >> interf
2016-03-09 15:58 GMT+02:00 Nicholas Krause :
> This adds properly checking after the call to mvs_find_dev_mvi
> due to this function being able to return a NULL pointer and if
> this does arise we will deference it in mvs_alloc_dev due to
> this function never checking if a NULL pointer is given as
> On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 07:09:49PM -, yga...@codeaurora.org wrote:
>> > On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 04:11:33PM +0200, Yaniv Gardi wrote:
>> >> This patch exposes the ioctl interface for UFS driver via SCSI device
>> >> ioctl interface. As of now UFS driver would provide the ioctl for
>> query
>>
On 09.03.2016 16:15, John David Anglin wrote:
> On 2016-03-09 9:43 AM, Ming Lei wrote:
>>> We've provided all the information you asked for, what's the next step
>>> >on this, or do we have to unwind the bio splitting code with reverts
>>> >until it starts working?
>> John, Helge, and I did discuss
On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 08:52:59PM -, yga...@codeaurora.org wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 07:09:49PM -, yga...@codeaurora.org wrote:
> >> > On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 04:11:33PM +0200, Yaniv Gardi wrote:
> >> >> This patch exposes the ioctl interface for UFS driver via SCSI device
> >> >>
On Wed, 2016-03-09 at 22:20 +0100, Helge Deller wrote:
> On 09.03.2016 16:15, John David Anglin wrote:
> > On 2016-03-09 9:43 AM, Ming Lei wrote:
> > > > We've provided all the information you asked for, what's the
> > > > next step
> > > > > on this, or do we have to unwind the bio splitting code
On Wed, 09 Mar 2016 22:33:47 +0200, DÄvis MosÄns said:
> About whether mvs_find_dev_mvi can return NULL it looks like it's possible,
> but I'm not sure if it practically happens. I guess it did hence patch.
Or the "bug" was found by incorrect code inspection. Nick has a history
of submitting p
> "Doug" == Douglas Gilbert writes:
Doug> Make sure that a user space pointer is passed through when data
Doug> follows the sg_header structure and command. Fix the abnormal
Doug> case when a non-zero reply_len is also given.
Applied to 4.5/scsi-fixes.
--
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Li
> "Lars-Peter" == Lars-Peter Clausen writes:
Lars-Peter> Calling synchronize_irq() right before free_irq() is quite
Lars-Peter> useless. On one hand the IRQ can easily fire again before
Lars-Peter> free_irq() is entered, on the other hand free_irq() itself
Lars-Peter> calls synchronize_irq()
> "Yaniv" == Yaniv Gardi writes:
Yaniv> Currently we use the host quirks mechanism in order to handle
Yaniv> both device and host controller quirks. In order to support
Yaniv> various of UFS devices we should separate handling the device
Yaniv> quirks from the host controller's.
This patch
> "Tom" == tom ty89 writes:
Tom,
Tom> Some devices have details of their support on unmapping on the
Tom> Block Limits and/or Logical Block Provisioning VPDs while they do
Tom> not set the LBPME bit to 1. Though this is required by the SCSI
Tom> standards, the VPDs are giving even more concr
> "Tom" == Tom Yan writes:
Tom> Btw, why SD_MAX_WS16_BLOCKS (which is used for both SD_LBP_WS16 and
Tom> SD_LBP_UNMAP) is set to 0x7f (23-bit) instead of 0x
Tom> (32-bit, 4-byte)?
This limit represents the largest block range we can describe using a
single bio.
--
Martin K. Pet
> Right.
> I just succeeded in reproducing the bug with moving blk_bio_segment_split()
> into an own file (and with "extern" instead of "static" in blk-merge.c).
> When compiled with -O2 it still crashes. So, next step is to analyze what
> gcc does wrong when compiling this function. It should get
37 matches
Mail list logo
