On 10/03/2012 10:12 PM, Robert Love wrote:
The user space HBA API vendor libraries need to know which HBA/CNAs
hosts to manage. Currently, libhbalinux is used to manage a few drivers
that use libfcoe and libfc. Right now libhbalinux keys off of the
string " over " in the FC Host's symbolic_name a
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48241
--- Comment #9 from Anonymous Emailer
2012-10-04 07:34:55 ---
Reply-To: danielfsan...@att.net
On 10/03/2012 10:23 AM, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-10-03 at 15:04 +, bugzilla-dae...@bugzilla.kernel.org
> wrote:
>> https://bugzil
On 10/03/2012 10:23 AM, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-10-03 at 15:04 +, bugzilla-dae...@bugzilla.kernel.org
> wrote:
>> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48241
>>
>>Summary: oops when setting up LVM
>>Product: IO/Storage
>>Version: 2.5
>>
Il 25/09/2012 17:30, Paolo Bonzini ha scritto:
> The set of use cases for SG_IO is quite variable that no single filter can
> accomodate all of them. The current filter is tailored very much to
> CD burning, and includes many MMC-specific commands that may have
> other meanings in different standa
Hi,
With the mainline kernel (in the merge window) I am seeing the following lockdep
splat every time during boot.
Regards,
Srivatsa S. Bhat
>
[3.940316] SCSI subsystem initialized
[3.949021] Fusion MPT base driver 3.04.20
[3.953141] Copyright (c)
On Thu, 4 Oct 2012, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
> With the mainline kernel (in the merge window) I am seeing the following
> lockdep
> splat every time during boot.
>
> Regards,
> Srivatsa S. Bhat
>
> >
>
> [3.940316] SCSI subsystem initialized
> [3.9490
Hi Jiri,
Thanks for taking a look!
> This seems to be real. You should be seeing that since 3.5-rc1 already
> though ... ?
>
> Does the patch below fix that?
>
Yes, it does, thanks! But 3.6-rc kernels were booting fine as far as I remember.
I'll check again and get back tomorrow.
>
> From:
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 12:14 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 11:22 AM, Gwendal Grignou wrote:
>> This set of patches improve ATA transport classes integration with SCSI
>> objects.
>>
>> Before [2.6.x]
>>
>> Ata and scsi transport class where separated:
>> `--:09:00.0
>> | `
>Compiling qla_gs.o (part of the qla2xxx module) triggers two GCC
>warnings:
>drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_gs.c: In function Œqla2x00_fdmi_rhba¹:
>drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_gs.c:1339:7: warning: array subscript is
>above array bounds [-Warray-bounds]
>drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_gs.c: In fu
On Thu, 2012-10-04 at 21:11 +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
> Hi Jiri,
>
> Thanks for taking a look!
Hi Srivatsa & Jiri,
>
> > This seems to be real. You should be seeing that since 3.5-rc1 already
> > though ... ?
> >
> > Does the patch below fix that?
> >
>
> Yes, it does, thanks! But 3.6
v2:
Fixed typo in patch #2 and I've now provided a pull URL at:
git://open-fcoe.org/fcoe/linux-fcoe.git tags/for-james-2-tag
--
v1:
Here are a few bug fixes for libfc and fcoe.
Additionally there is a documentation fix for sysfs-bus-fcoe included.
---
Neerav Parikh (1):
fcoe: Fix write
From: Neerav Parikh
SCSI errors were generated while writing to LUNs
connected via NPIV ports.
Debugging this it was found that the FCoE packets
transmitted via the NPIV ports were not tagged with
correct user priority as negotiated with peer by DCB
agent. This resulted in FCoE traffic going wit
From: Yi Zou
In LUN RESET testing involving NetApp targets, it is observed that LUN
RESET is failing. The fc_fcp_resp() is not completing the completion
for the LUN RESET task since fc_fcp_resp assumes that the FCP_RSP_INFO
is 8 bytes with the 4 byte reserved field, where in case of NetApp target
The Link Error Status Block attributes are incorrectly named as they do
not have the lesb_ prefix, but instead are grouped in the lesb/ attribute
group.
Signed-off-by: Robert Love
Tested-by: Ross Brattain
---
Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-fcoe | 12 ++--
1 file changed, 6 insert
On 10/3/2012 12:23 PM, Neil Horman wrote:
> James, Robert-
> I've been doing lots of backports of FCoE code to the RHEL tree these
> last few months, and I've noticed something fairly irritating, and I was
> wondering if you two could help me out with it (in fact you two are the only
> two
>
> On 10/3/2012 12:23 PM, Neil Horman wrote:
> > James, Robert-
> > I've been doing lots of backports of FCoE code to the RHEL tree these
> > last few months, and I've noticed something fairly irritating, and I was
> > wondering if you two could help me out with it (in fact you two are the only
On 10/4/2012 12:08 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> On 10/03/2012 10:12 PM, Robert Love wrote:
>> The user space HBA API vendor libraries need to know which HBA/CNAs
>> hosts to manage. Currently, libhbalinux is used to manage a few drivers
>> that use libfcoe and libfc. Right now libhbalinux keys off
On Thu, Oct 04, 2012 at 09:31:08PM +, Love, Robert W wrote:
> On 10/4/2012 12:08 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> > On 10/03/2012 10:12 PM, Robert Love wrote:
> >> The user space HBA API vendor libraries need to know which HBA/CNAs
> >> hosts to manage. Currently, libhbalinux is used to manage a fe
18 matches
Mail list logo
