On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 11:40:18PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday, September 24, 2012, Aaron Lu wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 02:55:31PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > And I'd add a comment about the next poll.
> > >
> > > This appears somewhat racy, though, because in the
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 11:46:03PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday, September 24, 2012, Aaron Lu wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 03:06:11PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Monday, September 24, 2012, Aaron Lu wrote:
> > > > need_eject:
> > > > First consider how the device w
On Tue, 2012-09-25 at 01:21 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> On 09/25/2012 12:06 AM, James Bottomley wrote:
> > On Mon, 2012-09-24 at 17:00 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> >>
> >> drivers/scsi/sd.c |4
> >> drivers/scsi/sd.h |2 +-
> >> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
>
On Tue, 2012-09-25 at 16:18 +0800, Aaron Lu wrote:
> A example patch would be something like the following, I didn't seperate
> these ACPI calls in sr.c as this is just a concept proof, if this is the
> right thing to do, I will separate them into another file sr-acpi.c and
> make empty stubs for t
On Tuesday, September 25, 2012, Aaron Lu wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 11:40:18PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Monday, September 24, 2012, Aaron Lu wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 02:55:31PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > And I'd add a comment about the next poll.
> > > >
Compiling aic94xx_sds.o (part of the aic94xx driver) triggers this GCC
warning:
drivers/scsi/aic94xx/aic94xx_sds.c: In function 'asd_read_flash':
drivers/scsi/aic94xx/aic94xx_sds.c:597:21: warning: 'offs' may be used
uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
drivers/scsi/a
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 03:02:29PM +0400, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-09-25 at 16:18 +0800, Aaron Lu wrote:
> > A example patch would be something like the following, I didn't seperate
> > these ACPI calls in sr.c as this is just a concept proof, if this is the
> > right thing to do, I wi
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 01:47:52PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, September 25, 2012, Aaron Lu wrote:
> > I'm thinking of enabling this GPE in sr_suspend once we decided that it
> > is ready to be powered off, so the time frame between sr_suspend and
> > when the power is actually re
On Tuesday 25 September 2012 22:20:21 Aaron Lu wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 01:47:52PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Tuesday, September 25, 2012, Aaron Lu wrote:
> > > I'm thinking of enabling this GPE in sr_suspend once we decided that it
> > > is ready to be powered off, so the time
On 09/25/2012 10:23 PM, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> On Tuesday 25 September 2012 22:20:21 Aaron Lu wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 01:47:52PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> On Tuesday, September 25, 2012, Aaron Lu wrote:
I'm thinking of enabling this GPE in sr_suspend once we decided that it
On 08/09/12 17:41, Bart Van Assche wrote:
[ ... ]
Hello Dave,
More than six weeks have elapsed since I posted version four of this
patch series. It would be appreciated if you could tell me when review
comments for this patch series will be posted. I'd also like to remind
you that some time
The set of use cases for SG_IO is quite variable that no single filter can
accomodate all of them. The current filter is tailored very much to
CD burning, and includes many MMC-specific commands that may have
other meanings in different standards. Someone may want to remove
those commands; at the
This adds two new sysfs attributes to the queue kobject. The attributes
allow reading and writing the whitelist of unprivileged commands.
This is again a bit different from what was removed in commit 018e044
(block: get rid of queue-private command filter, 2009-06-26), but the idea
is the same.
Using /dev/sg for scanners is blocked from unprivileged users. Reimplement
this using customizable command filters, so that the sysfs knobs will work
in this case too.
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini
---
v1->v2: OOM check [Alan Cox]
use GFP_ATO
The command filter used to be mutable via sysfs, but this was broken
and backed out. Let's add it back. This patch adds the infrastructure
for filtering, but unlike the old code this one just adds a pointer to
request_queue, so as to make it cheaper in the majority of cases where
no special filte
>
> On 09/24/12 20:52, Robert Love wrote:
> > In LUN RESET testing involving NetApp targets, it is observed that LUN
> > RESET is failing. The fc_fcp_resp() is not completing the completiong
>
> It looks like there is a typo in the patch description (in the last word
> of the second line) ?
>
>
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 09:26:00AM +0300, Adrian Sandu wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 12:38 AM, Sarah Sharp
> wrote:
> > Ok, so 3.4.11 doesn't work, and the log file was from 3.5.
>
> If you want I can provide a 3.4 log...
Hmm, does a 3.3 stable kernel work for you? I have a hypothesis.
Alan
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 2:19 PM, Sarah Sharp
wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 09:26:00AM +0300, Adrian Sandu wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 12:38 AM, Sarah Sharp
>> wrote:
>> > Ok, so 3.4.11 doesn't work, and the log file was from 3.5.
>>
>> If you want I can provide a 3.4 log...
>
> Hmm, does
On Tuesday, September 25, 2012, Aaron Lu wrote:
> On 09/25/2012 10:23 PM, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> > On Tuesday 25 September 2012 22:20:21 Aaron Lu wrote:
> >> On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 01:47:52PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >>> On Tuesday, September 25, 2012, Aaron Lu wrote:
> I'm thinking
Cc: Lukasz Dorau
Cc: Maciej Patelczyk
Signed-off-by: Dave Jiang
---
MAINTAINERS |7 ---
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index b17587d..162f602 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -3552,11 +3552,12 @@ K: \b(ABS|SYN)
i_intel
> microcode sg xhci_hcd button ext3 jbd mbcache sd_mod crc_t10dif\
> elper cryptd lrw aes_x86_64 xts gf128mul ahci libahci pata_acpi ata_generic
> dm_mirror dm_region_hash dm_log dm_mod
> CPU 0
> Pid: 753, comm: fsck.ext3 Not tainted 3.6.0-rc7-next-20120925+ #4
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 11:45:34PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, September 25, 2012, Aaron Lu wrote:
> > On 09/25/2012 10:23 PM, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 25 September 2012 22:20:21 Aaron Lu wrote:
> > >> On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 01:47:52PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
22 matches
Mail list logo
