Mark Fortescue wrote:
>
> I must get an email client that does not mangle patches. Any
> recomendations ?
>
If you want to use Thunderbird than you must do two things:
1. "Edit"/"Preferences"/"Composition"/"General" tab/
Wrap plain text messages at | 0 | characters.
(Yes now you must f
On 02/08/07, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Aug 2007 01:55:33 +0200
> Jesper Juhl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
[snip]
> > +++ b/drivers/message/fusion/mptbase.c
> > @@ -1393,18 +1393,18 @@ mpt_attach(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct
> > pci_device_id *id)
> > struct p
Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On Wed, 01 Aug 2007 08:51:14 -0500 James Bottomley wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 2007-07-31 at 11:40 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>> On Tue, 31 Jul 2007 10:59:51 +0300 Boaz Harrosh wrote:
>>>
Randy Dunlap wrote:
> Since you grok all of that (above), maybe you can help here:
>>>
Hello,
the build with the attached .config failed, make ends with:
...
CC [M] drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.o
CC [M] drivers/scsi/advansys.o
drivers/scsi/advansys.c:794:2: warning: #warning this driver is still not
properly converted to the DMA API
drivers/scsi/advansys.c: In function 'adv
On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 01:13:45PM +0200, Toralf F?rster wrote:
> Hello,
>
> the build with the attached .config failed, make ends with:
> ...
> drivers/scsi/advansys.c: In function 'advansys_board_found':
> drivers/scsi/advansys.c:17781: error: implicit declaration of function
> 'to_pci_dev'
We
Hello,
I am trying to use a LSI53C1020 based adapter on a PowerPC board with
MPC8641D processor. When initializing, the driver crashes the system
with the error message below. Kernel version is 2.6.22.1, driver
3.04.04. The chip on the adapter is a 53C1020, but the driver detects a
53C1030.
Has an
> "jidong" == jidong xiao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
jidong> I know sg_modes can help to perform a SCSI MODE SENSE command,
jidong> is there any tool/command that can perform a READ Capacity
jidong> command?
sg_readcap
--
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
-
To unsubscribe f
I know sg_modes can help to perform a SCSI MODE SENSE command, is
there any tool/command that can perform a READ Capacity command?
Thanks
Jason Xiao
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://
Martin K. Petersen wrote:
>> "jidong" == jidong xiao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> jidong> I know sg_modes can help to perform a SCSI MODE SENSE command,
> jidong> is there any tool/command that can perform a READ Capacity
> jidong> command?
>
> sg_readcap
In the sg3_utils package there is
This looks small and innocuous, but it's actually the beginning of
moving the upper layer drivers into block and adding a filtering layer.
The idea is that the queue contains a queue_protocol parameter which
details what the device actually speaks. The requests are likewise
filled in with a cmd_pr
Rob Landley wrote:
> On Thursday 26 July 2007 9:15:11 am James Bottomley wrote:
>> On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 23:28 -0400, Rob Landley wrote:
>>> 1) Is the summary of the scsi subsystem in appendix A of your 2002 OLS
>>> paper still more or less current? (The scsi mid-layer document never
>>> seems to
On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 12:47:25PM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> This looks small and innocuous, but it's actually the beginning of
> moving the upper layer drivers into block and adding a filtering layer.
> The idea is that the queue contains a queue_protocol parameter which
> details what the d
On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 12:51 -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 12:47:25PM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> > This looks small and innocuous, but it's actually the beginning of
> > moving the upper layer drivers into block and adding a filtering layer.
> > The idea is that the que
On Thu, 02 Aug 2007 14:26:47 +0300 Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > On Wed, 01 Aug 2007 08:51:14 -0500 James Bottomley wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, 2007-07-31 at 11:40 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 31 Jul 2007 10:59:51 +0300 Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> >>>
> Randy Dunlap wrote:
On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 12:09 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > 5. Now a Test Unit Ready comes in. Already a good second and more after
> >the eject. The card is clearly not powered by now.
> >aha152x_internal_queue should check it's own presence. and return
> >appropriate value.
> >Two
If the driver fails to allocate the contiguous (DMAable) memory for
system reasons, we fail to load the instance, but then we try to free
the allocation in the cleanup code and we get a panic in
pci_free_consistent(). This is reported against an older kernel, hope
this is relevant for latest/great
Hi Randy,
On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 12:09:26 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > 6. One more second passes and 2nd abort comes in.
> > 7. Than a reset comes in. Here too Should driver check for hardware
> >presence.
> >
> > since ds.c is doing: p_dev->_removed=1;
> > before the shutdown. Maybe a sol
> Rob Landley wrote:
>> On Thursday 26 July 2007 9:15:11 am James Bottomley wrote:
>>> Users have great difficulty understanding how to
>>> map sg to sr (or sd), so we're trying to encourage them only to use the
>>> actual device node, so /dev/sdx or /dev/srn.
>> Actually, these days everybody I k
> Rob Landley wrote:
>> So if you don't attach an sg to every sd, then either there are holes, or
>> they
>> don't line up, in which case how do you tell which sg goes with a given sd?
Sysfs has pointers from a SCSI logical unit device to the corresponding
sd device and sg device...
$ ll /sys/b
On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 12:54:06PM -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 11:28:38AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Well you've sent it a couple of times, and I've sent it in five more times
> > over the past year. Once we were told "awaiting maintainer ack".
> >
> > This situati
On Thu, 2 Aug 2007 12:09:26 -0700 Randy Dunlap wrote:
-
> > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/aha152x.c b/drivers/scsi/aha152x.c
> > index d30a307..5fe55d0 100644
> > --- a/drivers/scsi/aha152x.c
On Thursday 02 August 2007 5:39:55 pm Stefan Richter wrote:
> The place where these symlinks live might change in the future. See
> linux-2.6.23*/Documentation/sysfs-rules.txt.
I noticed this. I had a longish flamewar with Greg KH about this, which would
be ongoing if he hadn't stopped replying
On Thursday 02 August 2007 5:19:51 pm Stefan Richter wrote:
> > Rob Landley wrote:
> >> On Thursday 26 July 2007 9:15:11 am James Bottomley wrote:
> >>> Users have great difficulty understanding how to
> >>> map sg to sr (or sd), so we're trying to encourage them only to use the
> >>> actual device
On Thursday 02 August 2007 2:41:46 pm Douglas Gilbert wrote:
> > I'm still trying to figure what the other options _are_.
> >
> >> James
> >
> > Rob
>
> Interesting discussion.
I'm trying to pull together documentation of the scsi layer and link it into
the index I'm trying to put up at http://ke
24 matches
Mail list logo