On Mon, Apr 30 2007, Bob Tracy wrote:
> rct wrote:
> > Apologies to all concerned for an unfortunate delay in resolving this.
> > (...)
> > I'll go retrieve a more conservatively-configured source tree (closer to
> > what DSL-N uses) and start over...
>
> Success with the Debian 2.6.18-4-486 build
Jens Axboe wrote:
> Try Alan's patch, it should fix it. As mentioned earlier in this thread,
> the real fix is to get rid of the cgc stuff and inject into the block
> layer from cdrom.c. But Alan's patch should work-around the issue for
> now.
Trying that patch is the next thing on my plate. For
> That's as close as it gets without redoing everything from scratch.
> I'll give Alan's and James' patches a go within the next 13 hours.
>
> (Alan: what *else* would you name a variable associated with a bounce
> buffer besides Zebedee? Thanks for the occasion to smile...)
The one I sent has a
Forwarding to linux-scsi and linux-ide mailing lists.
Frank van Maarseveen wrote:
Tested on 2.6.20.6 and 2.6.21.1
I decided to swich from the old IDE drivers to libata and now there
seems to be a little but annoying problem: cannot mount an ISO image
after burning it.
May 1 14:32:55 kernel: a
On 01/05/07, Mark Lord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Forwarding to linux-scsi and linux-ide mailing lists.
Frank van Maarseveen wrote:
> Tested on 2.6.20.6 and 2.6.21.1
>
> I decided to swich from the old IDE drivers to libata and now there
> seems to be a little but annoying problem: cannot mount
The kexec patch introduced a superfluous (and otherwise inert) reset of
some adapters. The register can have a hardware default value that has
zeros for the undefined interrupts. This patch refines the test of the
interrupt enable register to focus on only the interrupts that affect
the driver in o
Constantin Teodorescu wrote:
> 03:02:15 kernel: [ cut here ]
> 03:02:15 kernel: kernel BUG at drivers/scsi/aic94xx/aic94xx_hwi.h:354!
On the odd chance you still have this controller (and have the time to
test out patches), would you mind applying this patch:
http://sweag
Salyzyn, Mark wrote:
> The kexec patch introduced a superfluous (and otherwise inert) reset of
> some adapters. The register can have a hardware default value that has
> zeros for the undefined interrupts. This patch refines the test of the
> interrupt enable register to focus on only the interrupt
Remove the unused header drivers/scsi/pci2000.h
Signed-off-by: Richard Knutsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
'grep -nr "pci2000"' on the whole tree results only in a reference to pci2000.h
Diffed against Linus' git-tree.
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/pci2000.h b/drivers/scsi/pci2000.h
deleted file mode 1
On Tue, 1 May 2007, Richard Knutsson wrote:
> Remove the unused header drivers/scsi/pci2000.h
i have the same patch in my pending patch directory, dated march 10,
so i know i submitted it, but i have no idea whatever happened to it.
rday
--
==
Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 30 2007, Douglas Gilbert wrote:
>> Jens Axboe wrote:
>>> On Mon, Apr 30 2007, Benny Halevy wrote:
Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 29 2007, James Bottomley wrote:
>> I'm still not really convinced about this approach. The primary job of
>> the block
Alan Cox wrote:
> The one I sent has a memory leak but it won't matter for basic testing.
> Or you can change the final bit to
>
>
> scsi_normalize_sense((char *)sense, sizeof(*sense), &sshdr);
>
> if (zebedee != cgc->buffer) {
> if (cgc->data_direction ==
On Tue, 2007-05-01 at 14:16 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Tue, 1 May 2007, Richard Knutsson wrote:
>
> > Remove the unused header drivers/scsi/pci2000.h
>
> i have the same patch in my pending patch directory, dated march 10,
> so i know i submitted it, but i have no idea whatever happened
On Tue, May 01 2007, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> Please consider the attached proposal. It is a complete block-level bidi
> implementation that is, I hope, a middle ground which will keep everyone
> happy (including Christoph). It is both quite small and not invasive,
> yet has a full bidi API that is ea
From: Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] bidi support: bidirectional request
Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 20:57:20 +0200
> On Tue, May 01 2007, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> > Please consider the attached proposal. It is a complete block-level bidi
> > implementation that is, I hope, a middl
James Bottomley wrote:
On Tue, 2007-05-01 at 14:16 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
On Tue, 1 May 2007, Richard Knutsson wrote:
Remove the unused header drivers/scsi/pci2000.h
i have the same patch in my pending patch directory, dated march 10,
so i know i submitted it, but i hav
From: Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] bidi support: bidirectional request
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 13:11:57 +0200
> On Sun, Apr 29 2007, James Bottomley wrote:
> > On Sun, 2007-04-29 at 18:48 +0300, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> > > FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> > > > From: Boaz Harrosh <
On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 10:11:03AM -0400, Salyzyn, Mark wrote:
> Foreign arrays are arrays configured on another adapter then moved over
> to the current host adapter. I do not know why this may be the case in
> your situation, but it had the smell of behaving like a foreign array
> and thus my sug
18 matches
Mail list logo
