Re: [PATCH 4/4] bidi support: bidirectional request

2007-04-29 Thread Boaz Harrosh
FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > From: Boaz Harrosh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: [PATCH 4/4] bidi support: bidirectional request > Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 20:33:28 +0300 > >> diff --git a/include/linux/blkdev.h b/include/linux/blkdev.h >> index 645d24b..16a02ee 100644 >> --- a/include/linux/blkdev.h >> +

Re: [PATCH 3/4] bidi support: request_io_part

2007-04-29 Thread Boaz Harrosh
Boaz Harrosh wrote: > - Extract all I/O members of struct request into a request_io_part member. > - Define API to access the I/O part > - Adjust block layer accordingly. > - Change all users to new API. > > Signed-off-by: Boaz Harrosh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Signed-off-by: Benny Halevy <[EMAIL PROT

Re: [PATCH 4/4] bidi support: bidirectional request

2007-04-29 Thread James Bottomley
On Sun, 2007-04-29 at 18:48 +0300, Boaz Harrosh wrote: > FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > > From: Boaz Harrosh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: [PATCH 4/4] bidi support: bidirectional request > > Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 20:33:28 +0300 > > > >> diff --git a/include/linux/blkdev.h b/include/linux/blkdev.h >

SAVE_DATA / RESTORE_POINTERS message confusion

2007-04-29 Thread Guennadi Liakhovetski
Hi all, looking at tmscsim (again) I cannot persuade myself that the handling of the RESTORE_POINTERS command is correct... Therefore a couple of questions: 1. do any devices at all use this message-pair? 2. are they ever sent apart from when accompanying the DISCONNECT / RESELECT? 3. if "ye

Re: SAVE_DATA / RESTORE_POINTERS message confusion

2007-04-29 Thread James Bottomley
On Sun, 2007-04-29 at 22:56 +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > Hi all, > > looking at tmscsim (again) I cannot persuade myself that the handling of > the RESTORE_POINTERS command is correct... Therefore a couple of > questions: > > 1. do any devices at all use this message-pair? Every *devi

Re: SAVE_DATA / RESTORE_POINTERS message confusion

2007-04-29 Thread David Miller
From: James Bottomley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 16:18:19 -0500 > On Sun, 2007-04-29 at 22:56 +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > > 2. are they ever sent apart from when accompanying the DISCONNECT / > > RESELECT? > > I've never seen an occasion, no. I have. > > 3. if "yes" t

Re: [RFC PATCH] m68k: switch to 53c700 driver

2007-04-29 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Fri, Dec 22, 2006 at 10:21:52PM +0100, Kars de Jong wrote: > On di, 2006-12-19 at 03:09 +, Al Viro wrote: > > > m68k-generic-io.diff > > > > Hmm... That breaks when you have ISA && !PCI (e.g. amiga or q40 defconfig): > > > > lib/built-in.o: In function `ioread32_rep': > > (.text+0xc31a):

[PATCH] deprecate the old NCR53C9x driver

2007-04-29 Thread Christoph Hellwig
Now that we have the much better esp_scsi driver and low level drivers are easy to port over deprecate the old NCR53C9x driver. I've Cc'ed the m68k and mips lists because all but one bus glues are for these platforms. Chances stand bad for the remaining driver, mca_53c9x which hasn't gotten any n