Jens Axboe wrote:
On Mon, Nov 27 2006, Mike Christie wrote:
Mike Christie wrote:
Boaz Harrosh wrote:
Playing with some tests which I admit are not 100% orthodox I have
stumbled upon a bug that raises a serious question:
In the call to scsi_execute_async() in the use_sg case, must the
scatterl
Every file should #include the headers containing the prototypes for
its global functions.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- linux-2.6.19-rc6-mm2/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c.old 2006-11-29
09:58:41.0 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.19-rc6-mm2/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c 2006-11-2
On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 20:52 -0500, Douglas Gilbert wrote:
> Mark Haverkamp wrote:
> > On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 13:46 -0800, Mark Haverkamp wrote:
> >> On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 13:44 -0500, Douglas Gilbert wrote:
> >>
> >> [ ... ]
> >>
> >
> > I don't know if this helps, but I found the verbose option.
Mark Haverkamp wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 20:52 -0500, Douglas Gilbert wrote:
>> Mark Haverkamp wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 13:46 -0800, Mark Haverkamp wrote:
On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 13:44 -0500, Douglas Gilbert wrote:
[ ... ]
>>> I don't know if this helps, but I found t
Apropos this thread
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-scsi&m=115591706804045&w=2
which led to this patch
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/jejb/scsi-rc-fixes-2.6.git;a=commit;h=b2b3c121076961333977f485f0d54c22121df920
do we not also need the following patch, nine lines lower in
On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 11:04:22AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> +#include "scsi_transport_api.h"
scsi_transport_api.h is a weird little file. It's not included by
anything in the drivers/scsi directory, only
drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_scsi_host.c:#include "../scsi_transport_api.h"
drivers/ata/libata-
Matthew Wilcox wrote:
On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 11:04:22AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
+#include "scsi_transport_api.h"
scsi_transport_api.h is a weird little file. It's not included by
anything in the drivers/scsi directory, only
drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_scsi_host.c:#include "../scsi_transport_
On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 09:13:35AM -0500, James Smart wrote:
> would it only go in include/scsi if it intends to be an exported
> api for LLDD's and/or user apps ? and stay in drivers/scsi if its
> an internal api within the scsi subsystem itself ?
It isn't clear to me that's the intended use of
On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 10:01 -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> Mark Haverkamp wrote:
> > I got this panic when loading the aic94xx module. The adapter is
> > connected to an HP MSA50 SAS enclosure with 3 72GB SAS disks.
> >
> > Kernel 2.6.19-rc6-scsi-misc on an x86_64
>
> > sas: task finished with
Hi,
we have not bought the device yet, but presently in the process to do so.
Before we buy it, I want to know about problems in advance...
I'm somewhat worried about this problem report
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/aic7xxx/2006-January/thread.html#4280
Especially as I don't see a final sol
Bernd Schubert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we have not bought the device yet, but presently in the process to do so.
> Before we buy it, I want to know about problems in advance...
None that I'm aware of from the point of view of the
Linux SCSI subsystem (starting at about half way through
the lk 2.4 series
Suppose reading sector 0 always reports an error,
sense key HARDWARE ERROR.
What I'm observing is that the request to read sector 0,
reading partition information, is retried forever, ad infinitum.
Does anyone have a patch to resolve this? (2.6.19-rc6)
Thanks,
Luben
-
To unsubscribe from th
--- Luben Tuikov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Suppose reading sector 0 always reports an error,
> sense key HARDWARE ERROR.
>
> What I'm observing is that the request to read sector 0,
> reading partition information, is retried forever, ad infinitum.
>
> Does anyone have a patch to resolve this
1) If the device reports an uncorrectable MEDIUM ERROR, such
as SK MEDIUM ERROR, ASC UNRECOVERED READ ERR, AMNF DATA
FIELD or RECORD NOT FOUND, then: In scsi_check_sense()
return SUCCESS so as to not retry -- the error is
uncorrectable -- this speeds up total processing time.
2) In scsi_io_complet
--- Douglas Gilbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mark Haverkamp wrote:
> > On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 20:52 -0500, Douglas Gilbert wrote:
> >> Mark Haverkamp wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 13:46 -0800, Mark Haverkamp wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 13:44 -0500, Douglas Gilbert wrote:
>
> >>
15 matches
Mail list logo