Re: [ANNOUNCE 0/6] Open-iSCSI High-Performance Initiator for Linux

2005-03-10 Thread Lars Marowsky-Bree
On 2005-03-09T18:36:37, Alex Aizman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Heartbeat is good for reliability, etc. WRT "getting paged-out" - > non-deterministic (things depend on time), right? Right, if we didn't get scheduled often enough for us to send our heartbeat messages to the other peers, they'll

aacraid died on kernel 2.4.27

2005-03-10 Thread Nic Ferrier
I've been trying, without success, to get the aacraid driver to work reliably on a Dell 2650 Poweredge. I'm using Debian so I tried kernel 2.6.8 first (Debian has it packaged nicely but from a SCSI driver point of view it's just a standard kernel.org source). 2.6.8 worked... but died as soon as w

ADAPTEC Ultra320 hotplugging with 2.6.x

2005-03-10 Thread bernd
Hi all, we have some problems replacing a SCSI disk in runtime. The problems started with kernel 2.6.x, with kernels 2.4.x we never saw any problems. We tried all kernels from 2.6.8 to 2.6.11-rc3-bk3-20050206171922-bigsmp, the last one we found for SuSE 9.2. All kernels showed this problem. Our b

[PATCH] 2.6 aacraid: adapter naming fix

2005-03-10 Thread Mark Haverkamp
>From Mark Salyzyn at Adaptec. This fixes the way the aac device's id is calculated. Applies to scsi-misc-2.6 tree. Signed-off-by: Mark Haverkamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> = drivers/scsi/aacraid/linit.c 1.46 vs edited = --- 1.46/drivers/scsi/aacraid/linit.c 2005-02-03 18:48:49 -08:00 +++ e

Re: aacraid died on kernel 2.4.27

2005-03-10 Thread Ryan Anderson
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 09:01:50PM +, Nic Ferrier wrote: > I've been trying, without success, to get the aacraid driver to work > reliably on a Dell 2650 Poweredge. I've had problems there, too. With kernel 2.6.8. I just had another failure, and I got some better logs. Can you install the "

Re: [ANNOUNCE 0/6] Open-iSCSI High-Performance Initiator for Linux

2005-03-10 Thread Dmitry Yusupov
On Thu, 2005-03-10 at 11:27 +0100, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote: > On 2005-03-09T18:36:37, Alex Aizman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >That works well in our current development series, and if you want to > > >share code, you can either rip it off (Open Source, we love ya ;) or we > > >can spin off the