On 07/04/2014 11:52 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 04/07/2014 11:36, Christoph Hellwig ha scritto:
I got an older Ack from Tomo for the removal, and some sort of acks
for the ibmvscsi target removal from Brian, Paolo and Nathan.
Can I get some formal reviews for the code removal patches (1-4) so I
Il 04/07/2014 11:36, Christoph Hellwig ha scritto:
I got an older Ack from Tomo for the removal, and some sort of acks
for the ibmvscsi target removal from Brian, Paolo and Nathan.
Can I get some formal reviews for the code removal patches (1-4) so I
can queue this up for 3.17?
Not that there'
I got an older Ack from Tomo for the removal, and some sort of acks
for the ibmvscsi target removal from Brian, Paolo and Nathan.
Can I get some formal reviews for the code removal patches (1-4) so I
can queue this up for 3.17?
I'll have to redo patch 5 for various changes and will resend it in
t
Any comments on this series?
The last time the subject came up in
http://marc.info/?t=13905694535&r=1&w=2 Tomo said:
"I'm not sure there are any users of the driver. I guess that
you could try to remove the driver to see if someone would complain."
and Hannes brought up a mysteria out of tre
This removes the old tgt infrastructure that has never been used except for
the obsolete ibmvstgt hardware (for which a working scst and a never fully
working lio driver exists). By it's intimate tie-in into the initiator
layer it gets massively in the way of improvements in the initiator, most
im
5 matches
Mail list logo
