On 28/11/13 13:29, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
On 11/26/2013 05:26 PM, Douglas Gilbert wrote:
On 13-11-26 11:06 AM, Benjamin ESTRABAUD wrote:
[ .. ]
"rescan-scsi-bus.sh" did detect new LUN, but apparently not
removed ones.
However I need to test it on a system with a compatible bash shell
as I wasn
On 11/26/2013 05:26 PM, Douglas Gilbert wrote:
> On 13-11-26 11:06 AM, Benjamin ESTRABAUD wrote:
[ .. ]
>> "rescan-scsi-bus.sh" did detect new LUN, but apparently not
>> removed ones.
>> However I need to test it on a system with a compatible bash shell
>> as I wasn't
>> able to run the script with
On 13-11-26 11:06 AM, Benjamin ESTRABAUD wrote:
On 25/11/13 17:17, Ewan Milne wrote:
On Mon, 2013-11-25 at 15:37 +, Benjamin ESTRABAUD wrote:
Hi,
Using the qla2xxx driver from Linux 3.10.1 (release), if a LUN from the
target side (multiple drives exported over a LIO IBlock qla2xxx export)
On 25/11/13 17:17, Ewan Milne wrote:
On Mon, 2013-11-25 at 15:37 +, Benjamin ESTRABAUD wrote:
Hi,
Using the qla2xxx driver from Linux 3.10.1 (release), if a LUN from the
target side (multiple drives exported over a LIO IBlock qla2xxx export)
is removed at the LIO level, the initiator side w
On Mon, 2013-11-25 at 15:37 +, Benjamin ESTRABAUD wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Using the qla2xxx driver from Linux 3.10.1 (release), if a LUN from the
> target side (multiple drives exported over a LIO IBlock qla2xxx export)
> is removed at the LIO level, the initiator side will not automatically
> det
Hi,
Using the qla2xxx driver from Linux 3.10.1 (release), if a LUN from the
target side (multiple drives exported over a LIO IBlock qla2xxx export)
is removed at the LIO level, the initiator side will not automatically
detect that this LUN was removed.
All commands to this LUN will fail (sg_
6 matches
Mail list logo
